Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
  • Overview
  • Experience

About Jonathan

Jonathan Bright is an Associate in the Atlanta office of Fish & Richardson, and his practice focuses on patent litigation.

Mr. Bright has experience in all major aspects of patent litigation, including motion practice, discovery, claim construction, infringement and validity analysis, assisting experts in the preparation of technical reports, taking and defending both fact and expert depositions, and trial. Mr. Bright has litigated before a variety of federal district courts and the International Trade Commission. Additionally, Mr. Bright has experience filing inter partes review petitions before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

Mr. Bright’s cases span a broad range of technologies including CMOS image sensors, 4G LTE network equipment, graphical user interfaces for set-top boxes, front-end radio architecture, food packaging, flash memory, and deposition of thin carbon films. He also has experience with standards-essential patents.

In addition to litigation, Mr. Bright’s practice includes analyzing patent portfolios to assess infringement risk and pro bono patent prosecution. Mr. Bright was previously a Summer Associate with the firm.

Prior to law school, Mr. Bright worked as a Graduate Research Assistant at the Georgia Tech Research Institute, where he helped develop missile warning systems by modeling threats and their response to IRCM at the circuit level. Mr. Bright also interned at ATA Engineering, a consulting firm, where he conducted structural analysis studies using finite element software.

Ahmed v. Kifle, et al. (11th Cir. 2015-18) – counsel for exiled Ethiopian dissident journalist in various appeals regarding alleged defamation claim filed by Ethiopian businessman

Certain Digital Cameras, Software, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1059 (2017-18) (McNamara, ALJ) – counsel for complainants Carl Zeiss AG and ASML Netherlands B.V. in ITC investigation of cameras imported by respondent Nikon

Huawei v. T-Mobile (E.D. Tex. 2016-17) – counsel for plaintiff Huawei in dispute involving 3GPP standard-essential technology

TiVo, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al (E.D. Tex. 2015-16) – counsel for counterclaim plaintiff Samsung

Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Computers, Tablet Computers, Digital Media Players, and Cameras, 337-TA-952 (2015) (Shaw, ALJ) – counsel for respondent in ITC investigation initiated by complainant Ericsson

Pactiv, LLC v. Highland Packaging Solutions, Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2015) – counsel for defendant Highland

EMS Techs., LLC v. Micron Tech, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2014-15) – counsel for defendant Micron

DiamondOP, LLC v. Guardian Indus. Corp. (E.D. Tex. 2014) – counsel for defendant Guardian

Focus Areas
Education

J.D. cum laude, University of Georgia School of Law (2014) Articles Editor, Georgia Law Review, 2012-2014


M.S., Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology (2011)


B.S. with highest honors, Electrical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology (2010)

Admissions
  • Georgia 2014
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia 2015
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas 2017
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado 2018
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit 2015
  • Georgia Supreme Court
TOP