Jonathan Bright focuses his practice on patent litigation. Jonathan has experience in all major aspects of patent litigation, including motion practice, discovery, claim construction, infringement and validity analysis, assisting experts in the preparation of technical reports, taking and defending both fact and expert depositions, and trial.
Jonathan has litigated before a variety of U.S. District Courts and the U.S. International Trade Commission. Additionally, Jonathan has experience filing inter partes review petitions before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Jonathan’s cases span a broad range of technologies, including CMOS image sensors, 4G LTE network equipment, graphical user interfaces for set-top boxes, front-end radio architecture, food packaging, flash memory, and deposition of thin carbon films. He also has experience with standard essential patents.
In addition to litigation, Jonathan’s practice includes analyzing patent portfolios to assess infringement risk and pro bono patent prosecution. He was previously a summer associate with Fish & Richardson.
Prior to law school, Jonathan worked as a graduate research assistant at the Georgia Tech Research Institute, where he helped develop missile warning systems by modeling threats and their response to IRCM at the circuit level. He also interned at ATA Engineering, a consulting firm, where he conducted structural analysis studies using finite element software.
Experience
Ahmed v. Kifle, et al. (11th Cir. 2015-18) – counsel for exiled Ethiopian dissident journalist in various appeals regarding alleged defamation claim filed by Ethiopian businessman.
Certain Digital Cameras, Software, and Components Thereof, 337-TA-1059 (2017-18) (McNamara, ALJ) – counsel for complainants Carl Zeiss AG and ASML Netherlands B.V. in ITC investigation of cameras imported by respondent Nikon.
Huawei v. T-Mobile (E.D. Tex. 2016-17) – counsel for plaintiff Huawei in dispute involving 3GPP standard-essential technology.
TiVo, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al (E.D. Tex. 2015-16) – counsel for counterclaim plaintiff Samsung.
Certain Electronic Devices, Including Wireless Communication Devices, Computers, Tablet Computers, Digital Media Players, and Cameras, 337-TA-952 (2015) (Shaw, ALJ) – counsel for respondent in ITC investigation initiated by complainant Ericsson.
Pactiv, LLC v. Highland Packaging Solutions, Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2015) – counsel for defendant Highland.
EMS Techs., LLC v. Micron Tech, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2014-15) – counsel for defendant Micron.
DiamondOP, LLC v. Guardian Indus. Corp. (E.D. Tex. 2014) – counsel for defendant Guardian.
