April 7, 2016
Regent Baby Wins Summary Judgment in "Sippy Cup" Trade Dress Case Brought by Luv n' Care
Court finds Luv n' Care's flip-straw top and hard spout cup generic and not protected by federal trade dress law
New York, NY, December 12, 2013 - Fish & Richardson announced today that its client, Regent Baby Products Corp. (Regent Baby), prevailed on its motion for partial summary judgment in an ongoing trade dress infringement suit with Luv n' Care Ltd. (LNC) and Admar International, Inc. over sippy cups and other baby products. On December 11, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an Opinion and Order holding that LNC's flip-straw top and hard spout cup are generic, "common shapes frequently used in the sippy cup industry" that do not warrant trade dress protection under the Lanham Act.
In business since 1946, Regent Baby is a family-owned company located in Queens, New York that sells baby feeding products as well as baby clothing, accessories, and juvenile items under the well-known BABY KING brand. LNC, which sells baby products under various private labels and the NUBY trademark, filed its suit against Regent Baby three years ago, in December 2010. LNC alleged trade dress infringement, design patent infringement, and other business torts related to more than a dozen baby products including sippy cups, food containers, teething keys, pacifiers, and pacifier holders. Prior to the recent Order, the patent issues were stayed pending reexamination and LNC withdrew all of its claims on nine of the products in dispute. The Court's Order dismisses two more of the disputed products - a flip-straw top and hard spout cup.
In granting Regent Baby's motion for partial summary judgment on the trade dress claims, the Court relied upon the "numerous examples" of other hard spout cups and flip-straw tops in the marketplace, explaining that a product shape that "conforms to well-established industry custom is generic." The Court also dismissed LNC's tortious interference claim, finding that it was supported by conclusory allegations and nothing more.
"We are extremely pleased with this result. This is a well-deserved victory not only for our client, Regent Baby, but also for all of the baby product manufacturers and retailers who have been the target of suits just like this one. Judge Scheindlin issued a comprehensive and well-reasoned opinion that falls squarely within Second Circuit precedent," said Kristen McCallion, principal at Fish & Richardson in New York, who is lead counsel on the case with John S. Goetz, also a principal in Fish's New York office.
Regent Baby Products Corp., popularly known as BABY KING, has been a leader in the infant category since 1946. Regent owns over 250,000 square feet of warehouse space and sells over 500 baby items through all channels of retail distribution.
May 14, 2021
Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Named Fish & Richardson Principal Andrew Pearson an "Up & Coming Lawyer"
March 13, 2023
Fish & Richardson Names Joshua A. Griswold as Managing Principal of Dallas Office
December 5, 2016
Juanita Brooks and Jon Singer profiled in National Law Journal's special report "High Stakes, Significant Victories"
July 17, 2017
Fish & Richardson Elects Deanna Reichel as a Principal
February 17, 2009
Fish Receives Top Rankings in IP Law360 Surveys
July 14, 2014
Fish & Richardson Sends 33 Students to Space Camp
October 12, 2018
Fish & Richardson Associate Jared Smith Receives Pro Bono Publico Award
February 12, 2009
Corporate and Chancery Year in Review: Top 10 Delaware Corporate Opinions of 2006
January 21, 2015