Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Articles

Supreme Court hears oral argument in Medtronic Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp. to determine if Plaintiff has the burden of proving non-infringement in declaratory judgment actions

November 11, 2013

Articles

Supreme Court hears oral argument in Medtronic Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp. to determine if Plaintiff has the burden of proving non-infringement in declaratory judgment actions

November 11, 2013

Back to News Listing

Under MedImmune who has the burden of proof on the issue of infringement/non-infringement in a declaratory judgment action brought on by a licensee? That is the issue that was discussed during the oral arguments of Medtronic Inc. v. Boston Scientific Corp. that were heard at the Supreme Court on November 5.

Fish’s Conrad Gosen, an Associate in the Twin Cities office, reviewed the oral arguments and reported the key points on today’s blog post. You can read our analysis on Fish’s Litigation Blog.


The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.
Related Attorneys
Related Services
Related Industries
Related Offices