Recent Developments Impacting Hatch-Waxman Litigation

This webinar has ended.


The past year saw significant decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and various district courts that impact Hatch-Waxman practice. As one example, the Supreme Court’s decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman has complicated the issue of personal jurisdiction in Hatch-Waxman lawsuits. Moreover, in Commil v. Cisco, the Supreme Court is considering whether a good faith belief in patent invalidity negates inducement under section 271(b).

Join Jon Singer and Brian Coggio, principals at Fish & Richardson, as they discuss noteworthy decisions from 2014. You can also expect this webinar to address:

  • Personal jurisdiction in Hatch-Waxman litigation
  • Good faith belief in invalidity to negate inducement
  • Obviousness in view of Bristol’s Baraclude decision
  • Drug labels as inducing infringement
  • Sham litigation and the recent Tyco decision
  • IPRs and their potential impact on Hatch-Waxman litigation