Blog December 2, 2020
USPTO Pilot Program Regarding Specimen Authenticity
- Person title
U.S. trademark practitioners have long dealt with the issue of applicants, either deliberately or innocently, claiming use of a mark with a far broader scope of goods than is actually the case. This results in a "bloat" of the trademark registry, making it harder and thus more expensive to clear new marks. In an effort to address deliberate overreaching, on March 6, 2018, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced a new pilot program to allow streamlined and simple objections to specimens submitted by third parties in support of a use-base application. A specimen of use must be submitted for each class of goods or services claimed in an application; and thus, while the pilot program does not address the common problem of "too many items" in one class, it is a step in the right direction.
Under the pilot program, any interested party may send an email to the Trademark Office (TMSpecimenProtest@uspto.gov) including either:
- Objective evidence of third-party use of the identical image without the mark in question, such as the URL and screenshot from an active website or a digital copy of a photograph from a print advertisement and the publication in which it was featured; or
- The prior registration numbers and/or serial numbers of applications in which identical images of objects, mock-ups of websites, etc., all bearing different marks have been submitted to the USPTO (in which case the subject line must read "Duplicative Specimens").
It is not necessary to attach copies of the specimens to the email. The Trademark Office will acknowledge receipt of the email, but the submitter will not receive any other response. Ideally, emails will be submitted prior to publication, and must be submitted no later than 30 days after publication. The Trademark Office may alter or terminate this program at any time.
If you become aware of any applications that contain suspicious specimens of use, we can assist in notifying the Trademark Office, which may result in a very low-cost way of preventing registration of a mark to which the applicant is not entitled. If you have any questions, please let us know.
The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.
Blog December 9, 2019
Blog July 26, 2019
Heightened Scrutiny of Specimens of Use at U.S. Trademark Office
Blog July 3, 2019
Legal Alert: New Rule Requires Foreign-Domiciled Trademark Applicants, Registrants, and Parties at TTAB to Be Represented by U.S. Attorney
Blog July 5, 2017
U.S. Trademark Office Clarifies Filing Deadlines for Resurrecting Dead Applications and Registrations
Blog June 8, 2017
Even GOOGLE Can Google After All
Blog May 19, 2017
What Does The "In" in "Incontestable" Mean?
Blog February 7, 2017
U.S. Trademark Office Sharpens Machete for Pruning Deadwood
Blog February 3, 2017
FDA Final Guidance on Nonproprietary Names of Biological Products
Blog August 1, 2016
Final FDA Guidance on "Low Risk Wellness" Products Adopts Novel Approach for Exempting Devices From Regulation
Article March 16, 2023
Attorneys Kristen McCallion and Darra Loganzo Co-Author World Trademark Review Article "Could AI Require Platforms to Do More to Prevent Infringement?"
Blog February 10, 2023
Need-to-Knows of the New Copyright Claims Board for Small-Value Copyright Claims
Blog December 12, 2022
Legal Alert: USPTO Updates Deadline to Respond to Trademark Office Actions
Q&A August 22, 2022
Principal Vivian Cheng Featured in Law.com Q&A Series "How I Made Partner"
Article June 16, 2022
Principal Cynthia Walden and Associate Sarah Kelleher Author World Intellectual Property Review Article "Selling the Intangible in Fashion: What Does It...
Blog March 8, 2022
The Basics of TTAB Cancellations
Blog November 9, 2021
The Basics of TTAB Oppositions
Blog October 5, 2021
ITC Monthly Wrap-Up: September 2021
Article July 23, 2021
Fish Principal Cindy Walden Authors World IP Review Article "Brand Owner's Friend: the Lanham Act at 75"
Q&A June 7, 2021