Blog March 23, 2020
Use of Generic Computer Functions to Make Traditional Economic Method More Efficient Does Not Confer Patent Eligibility
- Person title
OIP Techs., Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., ___F.3d ___ (Fed. Cir. June 11, 2015) (Taranto, Mayer (concurring), HUGHES) (N.D. Cal.: Chen) (4 of 5 stars)
Federal Circuit affirms judgment on the pleadings that patent was invalid under section 101.
The claims addressed "the concept of offer-based price optimization," slip op. at 6, which is a fundamental economic concept and an abstract idea under the first part of Alice. "[T]hat the claims do not preempt all price optimization or may be limited to price optimization in the e-commerce setting do not make them any less abstract." Id.
Beyond that idea, the claims merely recited "well-understood, routine conventional activities" such as sending electronic messages, storing results on a machine-readable medium, and using a computerized system to determine estimated outcomes. In addition, the claims were "exceptionally broad, and the computer implementation limitations do little to limit their scope." Slip op. at 7. Such elements, taken individually or together, do not transform the abstract idea into a patent-eligible application—at best, they simply automated the abstract idea "through the use of generic-computer functions." Id. That the claims' use of computers might enhance the efficiency of traditional price-optimization methods did not make the claims patent-eligible. Further, steps that required presenting offers to potential customers, or gathering statistics about customers' responses, were "routine, conventional data-gathering activities that do not make the claims patent eligible." Id. at 8. The patentee's reliance on Diamond v. Diehr, 450 U.S. 175 (1981), could not save the claims, as Diehr must be read in view of Alice, and the claims more closely resembled those in Alice.
Concurrence: Judge Mayer commended the district court for disposing of the patent eligibility issue on the pleadings, emphasizing that patent eligibility is a "threshold" issue.
The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.
Blog November 4, 2019
Legal Alert | Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. — What Did the Federal Circuit Do?
Blog August 17, 2018
En Banc Federal Circuit: Patentee's Service of Complaint, Followed by Voluntary Dismissal, Triggers IPR Clock
Blog October 5, 2017
Legal Alert: Federal Circuit Faults PTO's Approach to Claim Amendments During IPR, But Allows PTO to Try to Fix the Problem
Blog May 16, 2016
Software Claims Directed to Specific Improvements in Computer Operations May be "Non-Abstract"
Blog May 2, 2016
Corporate Residence Definition in Patent Cases Unchanged by Congressional Revisions to Venue Statute; Minimum Contacts Under Beverly Hills Fan Reaffirmed
Blog April 11, 2016
Claims Directed to Detection of Gene Variants Patent-Ineligible, Notwithstanding Mental Activity Requirement
Blog July 27, 2015
Judicial Review Available for Decision that a Patent Qualified for CBM Review; § 101 Review Appropriate in CBM Review
Blog July 8, 2015
Software Claim Addressing Concepts Long Known in Other Fields and Lacking Other Inventive Concept Is Not Patent Eligible
Blog June 18, 2015
Ordered Method Claim Does Not Bar Partly-Simultaneous Performance of Steps
Blog September 25, 2023
Federal Circuit Evaluates Enablement for Antibody Claims for the First Time Since Amgen v. Sanofi in Baxalta Inc. et al. v. Genentech, Inc.
Article December 27, 2022
Senior Principal John Dragseth Authors IPWatchdog Article "Top Federal Circuit Decisions of 2022 That No One Told You About"
Blog July 6, 2021
Federal Circuit Finds Digital Camera an Abstract Idea
Blog June 24, 2021
Legal Alert: What to Know about the Supreme Court's Arthrex Decision
Blog June 22, 2021
Legal Alert: Supreme Court Issues Opinion in U.S. v. Arthrex
Article January 4, 2021
Fish Attorneys Author Law360 Article, "Lessons For 2021 From Fed. Circ. Post-Grant Review Cases"
Q&A November 12, 2020
Q&A with Riqui Bonilla and Nitika Gupta Fiorella for Corporate Counsel Business Journal
Article September 1, 2020
Fish Attorneys Author Biosimilar Development Article, "An Update On 2020 U.S. Biosimilars Regulation & Litigation"
Blog June 26, 2020
First Circuit Finds Device Patent Improperly Listed in the Orange Book
Blog May 12, 2020