Blog December 2, 2020
U.S. Trademark Office Sharpens Machete for Pruning Deadwood
- Person title
Effective February 17, 2017, examiners at the U.S. Trademark Office may require trademark owners to submit more than one specimen of use per class of goods/services when registering a mark or maintaining a registration. The hope is that by giving examiners discretion they will be able to better determine the nature of the actual use of the mark and thus the scope of protection of any registration so that the register reflects actual commercial use and not just trademark owners wishful thinking.
The problem of "deadwood" on the U.S. register is well-known. Under the old rules, in place for decades, trademark owners had to submit only one specimen per class, even if the class included many different items. While trademark owners still had to aver that the mark was being used with all the items, undoubtedly some registrations have been granted or renewed for goods or services for which the mark was not in actual use. Giving examiners discretion to require additional specimens should help to pare down the scope of overbroad registrations, as registrations may be cancelled in whole or in part if the mark is not shown to be in use in U.S. commerce for the goods to which the examiner's inquiry pertains. By helping to reduce the clutter on the register the new rule should make clearing new marks easier, a goal shared by all trademark owners.
The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.
Blog December 9, 2019
Blog July 26, 2019
Heightened Scrutiny of Specimens of Use at U.S. Trademark Office
Blog July 3, 2019
New Rule Requires Foreign-Domiciled Trademark Applicants, Registrants, and Parties at TTAB to Be Represented by U.S. Attorney
Blog April 2, 2018
USPTO Pilot Program Regarding Specimen Authenticity
Blog July 5, 2017
U.S. Trademark Office Clarifies Filing Deadlines for Resurrecting Dead Applications and Registrations
Blog June 8, 2017
Even GOOGLE Can Google After All
Blog May 19, 2017
What Does The "In" in "Incontestable" Mean?
Blog February 3, 2017
FDA Final Guidance on Nonproprietary Names of Biological Products
Blog August 1, 2016
Final FDA Guidance on "Low Risk Wellness" Products Adopts Novel Approach for Exempting Devices From Regulation
Article March 16, 2023
Attorneys Kristen McCallion and Darra Loganzo Co-Author World Trademark Review Article "Could AI Require Platforms to Do More to Prevent Infringement?"
Blog February 10, 2023
Need-to-Knows of the New Copyright Claims Board for Small-Value Copyright Claims
Blog December 12, 2022
Legal Alert: USPTO Updates Deadline to Respond to Trademark Office Actions
Article August 22, 2022
Principal Vivian Cheng Featured in Law.com Q&A Series "How I Made Partner"
Article June 16, 2022
Principal Cynthia Walden and Associate Sarah Kelleher Author World Intellectual Property Review Article "Selling the Intangible in Fashion: What Does It...
Blog March 8, 2022
The Basics of TTAB Cancellations
Blog November 9, 2021
The Basics of TTAB Oppositions
Blog October 5, 2021
ITC Monthly Wrap-Up: September 2021
Article July 23, 2021
Fish Principal Cindy Walden Authors World IP Review Article "Brand Owner's Friend: the Lanham Act at 75"
Q&A June 7, 2021