Blog December 2, 2020
U.S. Trademark Office Reduces Filing Fees
- Person title
On December 16, 2014, the U.S. Trademark Office issued final rules reducing certain filing fees, effective January 17, 2015, as follows:
- New “TEAS Reduced Fee” application will feature a $50 fee reduction per class (from $325 to $275) for both (1) an application filed electronically using the regular TEAS application form and (2) a TEAS request to transform an extension of protection under the Madrid Protocol into a U.S. application, provided the applicant authorizes email communication and agrees to file all responses and other documents electronically during the prosecution of the application.
- "TEAS Plus" application fees will be reduced $50 per class (from $275 to $225) for applications in which (as now) the applicant uses language from the U.S. Trademark Office’s “Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.”
- TEAS renewal application fees will be reduced $100 per class (from $400 to $300).
The Office states that the reduced filing fees are possible “due to efficiencies that have allowed the Office to create an operating reserve and that the revised fee structure maintains a reserve sufficient to manage operations and address long-term investments.” The reduction also has the benefit of encouraging more filings, which can help businesses large and small protect their intellectual property and thereby help stimulate economic growth. The Office declined to adopt lower fees for small or new businesses, though left open the door that it will consider the issue in the future.
The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.
Blog December 9, 2019
Blog July 26, 2019
Heightened Scrutiny of Specimens of Use at U.S. Trademark Office
Blog July 3, 2019
Legal Alert: New Rule Requires Foreign-Domiciled Trademark Applicants, Registrants, and Parties at TTAB to Be Represented by U.S. Attorney
Blog April 2, 2018
USPTO Pilot Program Regarding Specimen Authenticity
Blog July 5, 2017
U.S. Trademark Office Clarifies Filing Deadlines for Resurrecting Dead Applications and Registrations
Blog June 8, 2017
Even GOOGLE Can Google After All
Blog May 19, 2017
What Does The "In" in "Incontestable" Mean?
Blog February 7, 2017
U.S. Trademark Office Sharpens Machete for Pruning Deadwood
Blog February 3, 2017
FDA Final Guidance on Nonproprietary Names of Biological Products
Blog March 28, 2023
U.S. Copyright Office Cancels Registration for AI-Generated Art, Issues AI-Related Registration Guidance
Article March 16, 2023
Attorneys Kristen McCallion and Darra Loganzo Co-Author World Trademark Review Article "Could AI Require Platforms to Do More to Prevent Infringement?"
Blog February 10, 2023
Need-to-Knows of the New Copyright Claims Board for Small-Value Copyright Claims
Blog December 12, 2022
Legal Alert: USPTO Updates Deadline to Respond to Trademark Office Actions
Article August 22, 2022
Principal Vivian Cheng Featured in Law.com Q&A Series "How I Made Partner"
Article June 16, 2022
Principal Cynthia Walden and Associate Sarah Kelleher Author World Intellectual Property Review Article "Selling the Intangible in Fashion: What Does It...
Blog March 8, 2022
The Basics of TTAB Cancellations
Blog November 9, 2021
The Basics of TTAB Oppositions
Blog October 5, 2021
ITC Monthly Wrap-Up: September 2021
Article July 23, 2021