Article February 28, 2013
Impact of Brexit Vote on Design Protection in the EU
- Person title
Even if Britain follows the results of the recent referendum and exits the EU, the IP effects are not likely to be dire. It has already been noted, for example, that there has been no suggestion that the UK will exit the EPC, the treaty that establishes the European Patent Office and relates to utility patent protection. The EU, on the other hand, administers the protection of designs as Registered Community Designs (RDCs). During the likely multi-year transition, the UK will no doubt choose to pass legislation to validate existing RDCs for enforcement in the UK. And the UK Intellectual Patent Office will continue, as it always has, to offer design protection in the UK via a national design patent.
The most substantive effect on design protection, long term, is that British attorneys will not be able to directly file EU RDC applications but will require the assistance of an attorney licensed in an EU country. We have already seen some British firms announcing, even in the 24 hours following the vote, plans to set up a satellite office in cities such as Munich. As our European attorneys are licensed in Germany, they will continue to be able to file and prosecute RDC applications and there will be no direct effect on the range of our services.
Of course, other IP effects are expected long term if the Brexit is completed. For example, the UK is not now expected to become a subject of the long-awaited Unified Patent Court, which will limit the territorial reach of such an enforcement option. Stay tuned for additional updates on the Fish Patent Blog.
The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.
Blog May 15, 2023
Legal Alert: Minimizing Patent TRO and PI Risk in Europe
Article March 22, 2023
Principals Anita Meiklejohn and Caleb Bates Co-Author Article for One Nucleus Annual Review 2023
Blog March 17, 2023
Legal Alert: The USPTO’s Transition to Electronic Patent Issuance and Reduction in Period Between Issue Notification and Issue Date
Article March 16, 2023
Attorneys Kristen McCallion and Darra Loganzo Co-Author World Trademark Review Article "Could AI Require Platforms to Do More to Prevent Infringement?"
Article March 8, 2023
Senior Principal Terry Mahn Authors Medical Device + Diagnostic Industry Article "This Company's False Compliance With CISPR 11 Resulted in a $12 Million FCA...
Blog February 17, 2023
Legal Alert: Germany Ratifies UPC Agreement; UP & UPC to Begin 1 June
Article February 17, 2023
Principals Patrick Darno and Peter Fasse Author "Patent Strategies for Protecting Bioinformatics Inventions" for IAM
Blog February 10, 2023
Need-to-Knows of the New Copyright Claims Board for Small-Value Copyright Claims
Article February 3, 2023
Fish & Richardson Attorneys Author IAM Article "Neglect Begets Opportunity in Femtech IP"
Blog December 12, 2022
Legal Alert: USPTO Updates Deadline to Respond to Trademark Office Actions