Article February 20, 2015
Hopping Mad: Public Pressure Forces Lagunitas to Drop Trademark Lawsuit
- Person title
- Of Counsel
On Monday, January 12, 2015, Lagunitas Brewing Company, noted maker of the popular India Pale Ale or IPA variety of craft beer, filed a trademark complaint against the Sierra Nevada Brewing Company over essentially the size of lettering on its labels. No doubt these two brewers are bitter rivals.
Three days later, after a storm of social media ridicule from its customers, Lagunitas voluntarily dismissed the suit with an apology. Lagunitas maintains that it had a good case and might have won in court, but that it would not be worth the loss it would suffer in the court of public opinion.
While I would certainly rather defend this suit than bring it, the arguments for confusion may not have been so baseless as all those hopping mad Tweets would suggest. First, Sierra's new IPA label is a small but curious departure from its standard label theme which could possibly have led to discovery on intent, a powerful factor when put forth with convincing circumstantial evidence. And sometimes a determinative one when put forth with direct evidence. Second, Lagunitas argued fairly that Sierra has been known to collaborate with other brewers and that consumers could infer that the two were working together on this batch.
But an intent to copy does not always equate to an intent to confuse. Ultimately, the need for brewers to communicate a big and bold message to consumers looking for an IPA would likely trump Lagunitas' arguments of unfairness.
The case is The Lagunitas Brewing Company v. Sierra Nevada Brewing Co., case number 3:15cv00153, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.
Blog November 6, 2013
Third Party Trademarks: Fair Use or Foul?
Article March 16, 2023
Attorneys Kristen McCallion and Darra Loganzo Co-Author World Trademark Review Article "Could AI Require Platforms to Do More to Prevent Infringement?"
Blog February 10, 2023
Need-to-Knows of the New Copyright Claims Board for Small-Value Copyright Claims
Blog December 12, 2022
Legal Alert: USPTO Updates Deadline to Respond to Trademark Office Actions
Article August 22, 2022
Principal Vivian Cheng Featured in Law.com Q&A Series "How I Made Partner"
Article June 16, 2022
Principal Cynthia Walden and Associate Sarah Kelleher Author World Intellectual Property Review Article "Selling the Intangible in Fashion: What Does It...
Blog March 8, 2022
The Basics of TTAB Cancellations
Blog November 9, 2021
The Basics of TTAB Oppositions
Blog October 5, 2021
ITC Monthly Wrap-Up: September 2021
Article July 23, 2021
Fish Principal Cindy Walden Authors World IP Review Article "Brand Owner's Friend: the Lanham Act at 75"
Q&A June 7, 2021