Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Q&A with Kurt Glitzenstein: Patently Powerful

June 5, 2017

Q&A with Kurt Glitzenstein: Patently Powerful

June 5, 2017

Back to Q&A Listing

 

Patently Powerful: When complicated tech, facts and law intersect, clients call Fish

Patent trial lawyer and Litigation Practice Group Leader, Kurt Glitzenstein, was interviewed by Metropolitan Corporate Counsel in the article “Patently Powerful: When complicated tech, facts and law intersect, clients call Fish.” In the interview, Glitzenstein discusses alternative fee arrangements (AFAs) and Fish’s innovative offerings eFISHency™ Legal Services and eFISHent™ Litigation. He also comments on Fish’s 13-year reign as the top patent litigation firm, and what’s in store for the future.  Click here to read the full article.

MCC: Our readers will be especially interested in your role as chair of the firm’s alternative fee program overseeing pricing and budget management. Give us your perspective on alternatives to the billable hour and how Fish approaches alternative fee arrangements (AFAs) both concerning patent litigation and litigation generally, which led to your inclusion by BTI Consulting in an elite group of corporate clients singled out as especially adept at AFAs.

Glitzenstein: We have been a pioneer in the area of alternative fee pricing for a long time. Fish started its AFA program in early 2009, and we have been partnering with clients to come up with fee arrangements that are tailored to their business needs and objectives before AFAs and fixed fees became industry buzzwords. Right now, AFAs (primarily fixed fees) represent 27 percent of our litigation business.

One of the many salutary benefits of having these conversations with our clients at the outset of a case is that it ensures that everyone is on the same page. We discuss schedule. We talk about when the case will be busy, and when it might slow down, so clients know when their scientists, engineers and businesspeople will need to engage. We explain how the case is likely to unfold on the merits. Importantly, we make sure we know their commercial objectives. We then come up with a proposal that takes into account all of these considerations. I’ve got a terrific team assisting with this, and we take great pride in both our flexibility and our creativity.

While we price many of our matters with a set monthly fee schedule, we also craft collared-fee deals and blended-rate arrangements. In addition, we’re very willing to explore bonus payments for achieving specified objectives or milestones. We understand that clients are generally very open to paying for success, and we are confident enough in our diligence and our abilities in the courtroom to make that option available.

One of the things I find very interesting is the number of times we go through this exercise and the client opts instead to retain us on a traditional hourly billing structure. This shows me that we are doing things right. We are presenting an array of options alongside a detailed discussion of how the case is likely to unfold, allowing our clients to make a well-informed business decision about what works best for them.

MCC: On a related note, tell us about the firm’s eFISHency™ suite of services, which is billed as enabling you to deliver exceptional value without sacrificing client objectives. What are the key elements of your approach?

Glitzenstein: Our ever-expanding suite of eFISHency™ legal services includes a wide range of cutting-edge yet practical tools and practices that help us deliver exceptional value. We have created very sophisticated Legal Project Management tools that allow us to quickly create a litigation budget, monitor actuals compared to budget, and allocate hours to our litigation teams to ensure we run the case to budget. To ensure we’re not recreating the wheel, we have customized best practices resources for use by litigation teams, including templates, checklists and guides to complete a variety of patent litigation tasks most efficiently, while maintaining our high standards. We also have an internal, custom-developed repository of tens of thousands of pleadings and memos as well as an extensive database of trial transcripts, outlines and demonstratives, with tailored searching by claim construction term, jurisdiction, judge or full text.”

Attorney Bio

Headshot
Kurt L. Glitzenstein | Principal

Kurt Glitzenstein is the firm’s Litigation Practice Group Leader and is responsible for the firm’s largest practice, which spans twelve offices. In addition, Mr. Glitzenstein is a patent trial lawyer and leads cases in venues across the United States, including the...

Filter by
News
January 26, 2017
Fish & Richardson Named Law360 IP Practice Group of the Year for Fifth Straight Year
Press Release
News
August 4, 2016
Fish & Richardson Named Litigation Powerhouse by Law360
Press Release
News
July 14, 2017
Kurt Glitzenstein Quoted in Law360 Article, "Patent Cases To Watch In The 2nd Half Of 2017: Part 2"
Media Mention
News
June 23, 2017
Fish & Richardson Announces 36 Attorneys Named “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property Magazine
Press Release
Q&A
June 5, 2017
Q&A with Kurt Glitzenstein: Patently Powerful
Q&A with Kurt Glitzenstein
Author: Kurt L. Glitzenstein
Litigation
Patent
High Tech
IP
AFAs
News
March 24, 2017
Fish Named Top Patent Litigation Defense Firm
Press Release
News
March 16, 2017
Fish Dominates at the Federal Circuit
Media Mention
News
November 16, 2016
Kurt Glitzenstein Featured on Cover of Metropolitan Corporate Counsel
Media Mention
Articles
News
June 8, 2016
Fish & Richardson Named to NLJ’s “2016 Intellectual Property Hot List” for Fifth Straight Year
Press Release
News
June 7, 2016
Fish & Richardson Named #1 Top Patent Litigation Firm for 13th Consecutive Year by Corporate Counsel Magazine
Press Release
News
June 2, 2016
Fish & Richardson Announces 36 Attorneys Named “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property Magazine
Press Release
Q&A
May 20, 2016
Q&A with Kurt Glitzenstein: What Differentiates Fish & Richardson From Other IP Firms
Q&A with Kurt Glitzenstein
Author: Kurt L. Glitzenstein
Life at Fish
Litigation
Patent
IP
load more topics