Daniel A. Tishman

Certain Lithium Ion Battery Cells, Battery Modules, Battery Packs, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, Inv. 337-TA-1181 (ITC) – Represent complainants LG Chem, LG Energy Solution, and Toray against respondent SK Innovation in four-patent case involving battery separator and cathode technology. Case pending.

Certain Pouch-Type Battery Cells, Battery Modules, Battery Packs, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, Inv. 337-TA-1179 (ITC) – Represent respondents LG Chem and LG Energy Solution against complainant SK Innovation in patent case involving pouch battery technology. Case pending.

Certain Subsea Telecommunication Systems and Components Thereof, Inv. 337-TA-1098  (ITC) – Represented respondent NEC against complainant Xtera in multi-patent case involving subsea telecommunication systems. Following trial, obtained determination of no violation.

Immersion Corp. v. Samsung Electronics (E.D. Tx.) – Representing defendant Samsung Electronics in multi-patent case involving haptics technology. Favorable settlement.

Certain Batteries and Electrochemical Devices Containing Composite Separators, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-1087 (ITC) – Represented complainants LG Chem and Toray against respondent ATL in multi-patent case involving lithium ion battery technology. Favorable settlement following trial.

SEVEN Networks v. Samsung Electronics (E.D. Tx.) – Representing defendant Samsung Electronics in multi-patent infringement case involving consumer electronics technologies related to power usage algorithms. Favorable settlement.

Certain Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1042 (ITC) – Represented complainants Paice and Abell against Ford in multi-patent case involving hybrid-electric vehicles. Favorable settlement following trial.

Certain Hybrid Electric Vehicles and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-998 (ITC) – Represented complainants Paice and Abell against Volkswagen, Audi, and Porsche in multi-patent case involving hybrid-electric vehicles.  Favorable settlement.

Certain Automated Teller Machines, ATM Modules, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-972 (ITC) – Represented respondent Nautilus Hyosung against Diebold in multi-patent infringement case involving a wide array of technology associated with ATMs.  Obtained finding of non-infringement as to certain products.

Paice LLC  v. Hyundai Motor Co., et al. (D. Md.) – Represented Paice and Abell in multi-patent infringement case involving hybrid-electric vehicles. Favorable settlement following trial, after obtaining $28.9 million verdict and finding of willfulness for client Paice and Abell.

Certain Television Sets, Televisions Receivers, Television Tuners, and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-910 (ITC) – Represented respondent LG in ITC investigation against complainant CrestaTech in multi-patent infringement case involving television tuner technology. Following trial, obtained determination of no violation.

Certain Microelectromechanical Systems (“MEMS Devices”) and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-876 (ITC) – Represented respondent InvenSense against complainant STMicroelectronics in multi-patent infringement case involving MEMS technology. Favorable settlement during trial.

IMS Health Inc. v. Symphony Health Solutions, Corp. et al. (D. Del.) (ITC) – Represented IMS Health in multi-patent infringement case involving healthcare analytics and informatics. Favorable settlement.

Ericsson v. Samsung Electronics (E.D. Tx.) (ITC) – Represented defendant Samsung Electronics in multi-patent infringement case involving a wide array of consumer electronics technologies. Favorable settlement.