Trial lawyer with experience spanning all phases of complex litigation or regulatory investigations, including handling multijurisdictional parallel proceedings both in district courts and at the International Trade Commission (ITC).
Sought after counsel for myriad multibillion-dollar global IP disputes.
Considered a pioneer and expert in the technically and legally challenging area of SEP/FRAND licensing and litigation.
Ben is an accomplished trial lawyer who handles patent and intellectual property matters—often as lead or co-lead counsel—across a broad range of industries, particularly in the fields of telecommunications, computer software, computer hardware, medical devices, mechanical products, and consumer products. He takes a holistic approach to litigation—thoroughly understanding his client’s business, products and technology. Ben is adept at leveraging that knowledge to explain complex problems simply, identify future challenges, provide strategic analyses and insights for a client’s competitive advantage, and deliver results in and out of the courtroom.
Ben’s post-trial work includes writing and arguing post-trial motions, as well as drafting appellate briefs. He also handles proceedings and advises clients on many state-law claims, particularly as they relate to complex technical issues, as well as antitrust issues and proceedings that might implicate multidistrict litigation.
SEP and FRAND Thought Leader
Ben was intricately involved in developing and executing strategies for the largest worldwide litigation regarding cellular standard essential patents (SEPs), which settled in 2019 after two years of hard-fought litigation. He is a go-to advisor as the industry prepares for an explosion of SEP/Fair Reasonable and Nondiscriminatory (FRAND) litigation relating to 5G technology, which will likely help redefine the field of patent litigation. In addition to litigation counsel, Ben advises a broad range of companies on SEP/FRAND licensing and royalties’ strategies to help them avoid litigation entirely, or better position themselves for litigation success.
Ben is actively involved in the community, teaching a high school mock trial class and regularly coaching youth sports. His pro bono practice includes work on immigration and prisoner advocacy matters.
Suffolk University Law School 2004 J.D. Editor-in-Chief, Journal of High Technology Review magna cum laude
Colorado State University 1999 Liberal Arts, B.A.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, The Honorable Ron Clark, 2004 - 2006
Memberships & Affiliations
Federal Circuit Bar Association, Global Fellow, 2018-2019
Eastern District of Texas Bench and Bar Conference, Planning Committee, 2012-Present
Houston Intellectual Property American Inn of Court, Member, 2014-2017
Appointed by (former) Chief Judge Davis of the Eastern District of Texas to serve on a special five-person committee of former EDTX law clerks, 2013-2018
Highlighted by Litigation Daily as a “Litigator of the Week” (June 1, 2018).
As the firm’s designated relationship partner for a Fortune 10 consumer electronics company, Ben coordinated and helped develop the litigation strategy for an epic multi-billion-dollar global royalty and patent dispute with Qualcomm. The two-year SEP-focused battle ended in a settlement after both sides presented opening arguments in a San Diego federal court.
Ben was also counsel for the same Fortune 10 client in a years-long, multibillion-dollar dispute over mobile-device patents against Ericsson. The two parties ultimately reached a licensing agreement after the ITC trial.
As co-lead counsel in a matter before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Ben helped secure a permanent injunction, treble damages and attorneys’ fees for his client, the Chamberlain Group (CGI), an industry leader in the garage door industry. Those enhanced results followed a jury verdict finding that Ryobi and parent company Techtronic Industries (TTI) willfully infringed two of CGI’s patents, initially resulting in blocked sales of certain Ryobi connected garage door until 2023, $11 million in damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs.
Not all significant results are secured before the courts. Ben helps clients, such as CGI, avoid potentially expensive litigation through proactive counseling, including in areas such as SEP/FRAND disputes surrounding an emerging smart-home technology that essentially moved CGI from the brick-and-mortar world into the realm of the Internet of Things (IoT)—and into the evolving SEP/FRAND legal environment.