May 14, 2021
Fish & Richardson Obtains Initial Determination Recommending a General Exclusion Order for Skull Shaver in Patent Infringement Dispute
Fish & Richardson obtained an initial determination at the International Trade Commission (ITC) recommending a general exclusion order for client Skull Shaver, LLC, the market leader in uniquely designed and patented handheld electric shavers and personal grooming products. A general exclusion order is a rarely recommended remedy at the ITC with a broad impact on the importation market.
In this initial determination, Skull Shaver's asserted U.S. Patent No. 8,726,528 ("the '528 Patent") and U.S. Design Patent No. D672,504 ("the '504 Patent") protecting its novel electric shavers were found to be infringed, and Skull Shaver was found to satisfy the domestic industry requirement of Section 337. The initial determination went on to find that Skull Shaver is entitled to a general exclusion order, as this remedy is necessary to prevent circumvention of an exclusion order only limited to certain named products, that there has been a pattern of violation of Skull Shaver's patents in the market, and that the sources of infringing products in the market are difficult to identify. Skull Shaver expects the decision to be upheld by the full Commission at the ITC.
"We are pleased to have secured a favorable initial determination from the ITC as we continue to help Skull Shaver protect its important patents against entities that continue to infringe on this unique product," said Betty Chen, principal in Fish's Silicon Valley office.
Earlier in this matter, Fish obtained default judgments against eight of the foreign respondents that were previously part of the Investigation, including Suzhou Kaidiya Garments Trading Co., Ltd.; Yiwu City Qiaoyu Trading Co., Ltd.; Wenzhou Wending Electric Appliance Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Aiweilai Trading Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Junmao International Technology Co., Ltd.; Shenzhen Wantong Information Technology Co., Ltd.; Yiwu Xingye Network Technology Co., Ltd.; and Bald Shaver Inc. The default judgments precluded these respondents from appearing in the Investigation and contesting the allegations at issue regarding infringement of Skull Shaver's '528 Patent and '504 Patent.
Fish also obtained a settlement and license agreement on behalf of Skull Shaver with respondent Magicfly LLC. As part of that agreement, Magicfly and its affiliate entities agreed to take a license to the '528 Patent for the past importation and sales of the accused Magicfly products. Magicfly and its affiliate entities also agreed to discontinue sales of the accused products moving forward.
The case is In the Matter of Certain Electric Shavers and Components and Accessories Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-1230.
March 13, 2023
Fish & Richardson Names Joshua A. Griswold as Managing Principal of Dallas Office
December 5, 2016
Juanita Brooks and Jon Singer profiled in National Law Journal's special report "High Stakes, Significant Victories"
July 17, 2017
Fish & Richardson Elects Deanna Reichel as a Principal
February 17, 2009
Fish Receives Top Rankings in IP Law360 Surveys
July 14, 2014
Fish & Richardson Sends 33 Students to Space Camp
August 10, 2017
Susan Morrison Named 2017 "Woman Worth Watching in STEM" by Profiles in Diversity Journal
February 12, 2009
Corporate and Chancery Year in Review: Top 10 Delaware Corporate Opinions of 2006
January 21, 2015
John Dragseth Quoted in Law360 article "Lawyers Weigh In On High Court Claim Construction Ruling"
March 31, 2016