- Litigation Overview
- Chancery and Corporate Governance
- Commercial Litigation
- Experts on Experts
- False Claims Act and Qui Tam
- ITC Litigation
- Patent Litigation
- Product Liability and Mass Torts
- Trade Secret Litigation
- Trademark, Copyright, and Media Litigation
Prosecution & Counseling
Our Drug and Medical Device team delivers regulatory know-how with value added by the scientific expertise of our intellectual property practice. Clients know that when they work with Fish, they need not teach their technology twice, as we offer one-stop shopping for both patent and regulatory work. Unlike most “FDA practices,” we have a unique technical capacity that comes from our world-class patent practice.
One of our unique specialties is advising on the relationship between patent and drug laws to protect patent exclusivity for products worldwide. In the United States, this means understanding the complex relationship between US patent laws and the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, better known as the Hatch-Waxman Act.
We advise and counsel clients on the scope and application of the 271(e)(1) safe harbor from patent infringement; Orange Book practice and patent litigation under 271(e)(2); marketing exclusivities for pioneers and generics; and patent term extensions.
Fish also has vast experience with FDA regulation of various products, including small-molecule drugs, biologics, homeopathics, and medical devices.
Fish’s Regulatory group advises pharmaceutical companies and research institutions throughout all stages of production, including design, development, and marketing of drugs and biologics.
We represent innovative biopharma companies around the world that specialize in some of the most cutting-edge technology, such as stem cell research, gene therapy, and tissue engineering.
Our drug and biologic regulation services include the following:
- obtaining orphan drug designations and biologics under the Orphan Drug Act
- aiding clients with the drafting of legal documents for clinical investigator agreements and informed patient consents
- advising clients on importing and exporting drugs and on product withdrawals
- advising on labeling and promotional issues that may occur before and after review by regulatory agencies
The regulatory and patent attorneys at Fish work closely on the various Hatch-Waxman issues that accompany drug, biologic, and medical device approvals.
We also teach the Patent Resources Group’s “Advanced Patent Law Course, Pharma & Biotech Strategies for Patent Prosecution, Hatch-Waxman, Litigation and Licensing,” a high- level three-day program that covers all aspects of Hatch-Waxman, including Federal Circuit and Supreme Court cases interpreting this complex and important statute.
Our services relating to the Hatch-Waxman Act include the following:
- advising clients on the marketing exclusivities that are available for new drugs and “first-mover” generics, and on Orange Book issues involving patented drug products
- counseling and representation on safe harbor exemptions from patent infringement for FDA-related activities and for assistance in securing patent term extensions for drugs, biologics, and Class III medical devices
- counseling clients on orphan drug approvals and pediatric exclusivity rights
Fish specializes in obtaining marketing authorization from the FDA, without which even the most innovative, lifesaving device cannot be legally marketed in the United States.
In addition, we have been instrumental in helping clients obtain medical device licenses from Health Canada. This service provides a one-stop shopping benefit for both the United States and Canada.
Our contacts around the world can also provide expert advice on the regulations applicable to their markets. Our advanced understanding of the international standards process allows us to help clients streamline the regulatory approval process, both in the United States and abroad.
Our ultimate goal is to ensure that our clients meet all of their regulatory requirements in the least burdensome manner possible. Our medical device approvals and compliance services include the following:
- navigating the maze of FDA requirements and restrictions for a wide variety of devices, ranging from cutting-edge 3-D X-ray equipment to dental cements
- advising on FDA regulations, including off-label marketing and other labeling issues, medical device imports and exports, establishment registration, device listing, recalls, corrective actions, and others
- counseling on the applicability of the FDA’s Quality System Regulation to a company’s activities
- preparing clients for FDA inspections assisting foreign manufacturers that sell devices in the United States to ensure that they comply with all relevant regulations
- Communications and Spectrum Regulation
- Drug and Medical Device Regulation
- Export Controls, Foreign Policy, and National Security Issues
- mHealth and Telemedicine
- Privacy and Data Security
- Satellites and Space Systems Regulation
February 15, 2018
White House Targets Generic Exclusivity to Lower Drug Prices
May 3, 2017
Terry Mahn Quoted in Biosimilar Development Article, "Surveying The Current Legal Landscape For Biosimilars"
April 27, 2017
Terry Mahn Quoted in Biosimilar Development Article, "Amgen Vs. Sandoz: Who Will Win Over The Supreme Court?"
January 11, 2017
21st Century Cures Act: No Cure for an FDA Patent Bias
Fish Litigation Blog
December 23, 2016
The First Amendment Does Not Protect All Off-Label Drug Promotion
Author: Terry G. Mahn
December 21, 2016
"US Solicitor Sides With Sandoz In Biosimilar Case" Law360 article
December 13, 2016
Terry Mahn Quoted in Law360’s “High Court Biosimilar Drama Intact After Amgen-Apotex Denial”
August 2, 2016
Fish's Keith Barritt Quoted in Bloomberg BNA's Health Care Daily Report, "Fitness Trackers, Wellness Apps Won't Be Regulated by FDA"
August 1, 2016
Final FDA Guidance on “Low Risk Wellness” Products Adopts Novel Approach for Exempting Devices From Regulation
April 27, 2016
Medical Device Trademarks 101: Protecting Your Good Name
December 7, 2015
Will the Trans-Pacific Partnership Derail Biologics?
December 2, 2015
Patent Infringement at the ITC: Implications for Brand-Name Drug Companies