Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
 
 

Patent Litigation

full services list
Patent Litigation Image

Litigation

Post-Grant

Prosecution & Counseling

Fish Patent Litigation 2016
High Profile, High Stakes Cases

The world’s leading companies have one thing in common: innovative products and services. That’s why they turn to Fish — the global leader in intellectual property (IP) litigation. With 12 offices across the United States and in Munich, Germany, Fish protects clients’ most valuable IP business assets around the globe. We’ve earned our elite position by consistently winning the most important, technically sophisticated, bet-the-company patent cases for such clients as Microsoft, Bose, Samsung, LG, Allergan, and Halo Electronics.

But one of our greatest strengths is providing long-term plans and solutions for clients, not just litigation advice. Making strategic decisions up front saves clients’ money and helps ensure a successful outcome.

Winning Track Record At All Levels Of The Judicial System

No firm is more sought-after or trusted by blue-chip clients with their highest stakes, competitor-to-competitor IP litigation. The reason is simple. Fish knows how to win from every angle, in district court, in the ITC, on appeal, and at the PTAB.

In 2016, Fish handled 120 more new patent cases than our nearest competitor and 17 percent of all patent cases that went to trial – which is more than any other firm. Most important, we win the largest cases, worth billions of dollars and with whole businesses often on the line. That is why more Fortune 100 companies in the world trust Fish — over any other firm — to handle their mission-critical IP litigation.

For thirteen consecutive years, Corporate Counsel has named us the #1 patent litigation firm in the country. In 2017, Law360 selected Fish as the “IP Practice Group of the Year” for the fifth straight year. U.S. News – Best Lawyers® recently named Fish the “Patent Litigation Law Firm of the Year,” and Managing Intellectual Property recognized Fish as the “U.S. Specialty IP Firm of the Year.” BTI Consulting named Fish a top firm for alternative fee arrangements, one of the most loved law firms by General Counsel, a feared firm for litigation, and a standout firm for collaboration. These are just a few of the honors that set us apart from other law firms.

We can handle everything and are, quite simply, the absolute best at what we do.

Deep Knowledge, Seasoned Trial Lawyers, Big Wins

Fish has more than 400 attorneys and technology specialists practicing IP strategy and counseling, IP litigation, and commercial litigation. More than 300 attorneys have degrees in science or technology. Add to that the 80 PhDs on our staff, and you get a law firm with unmatched expertise in virtually every technology area. Our deep bench includes nearly 70 attorneys who have first-chaired multiple cases, more than 70 former law clerks, and over 25 former Federal Circuit clerks with in-depth knowledge of these courts, giving us an insider’s edge.

Unlike some firms that build a practice around a single rock-star trial lawyer who tries every patent case, our attorneys have expertise in the most complex patent cases at every stage of the litigation: from Markman hearings and motions for summary judgment to trial and appeal.

Our litigation teams include top-notch patent prosecutors who have a deep understanding of clients’ technologies, potential prior art, patent laws and rules, and the fine distinctions between claims. Together, we develop creative and winning litigation strategies that other firms would never think of.

There is no other firm that can match the quality, breadth, depth, and dominance of our IP litigation practice. This is why Fish wins so many significant cases day in and day out, and is often at the forefront of developing new case law.

According to clients who spoke to Managing Intellectual Property, “Fish & Richardson is one of the largest and most successful IP specialty firms nationwide.” Considered an “IP powerhouse” across the board, “Fish is stocked with top IP subject matter experts. Their counsel is business-oriented and always geared to helping us achieve our objectives cost-effectively and with maximum IP protection.”


Featured Experience

Highlights

Search Fish Team

Search by Letter
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
No matches
Patent Litigation

Patent Litigation Team

What's Trending in Patent Litigation

Filter by
News
September 22, 2017
Jonathan Lamberson Quoted in Law360 Article, “A Newcomer’s Guide To Litigating Patent Cases In California”
Media Mention
Event
September 28th, 2017 | 11:30 am EDT
BPLA Biotechnology Committee: PTAB/Hatch-Waxman Parallel Proceedings
BPLA Biotechnology Committee: PTAB/Hatch-Waxman Parallel Proceedings
Speaking Engagement
News
September 19, 2017
Fish & Richardson Named 2017 General Patent Litigation Firm of the Year, Inter Partes Review Firm of the Year, and IP Boutique Firm of the Year by LMG Life Sciences
Press Release
Event
September 28th, 2017 | 8:00 am PDT
Benchmark Litigation Women in Business Law Forum LA
Benchmark Litigation Women in Business Law Forum LA
Speaking Engagement
Sponsorship
Fish Litigation Blog
September 13, 2017
Patent Litigation in E.D. Texas: When is a claim term indefinite?
Patent Litigation in E.D. Texas: When is a claim term indefinite?
Author: Vasiliy Mayer
IP Litigation
News
September 13, 2017
Fish & Richardson Principal Michael Zoppo Named a 2017 “Rising Star” by New York Law Journal
Press Release
News
September 12, 2017
Daily Journal Names Fish & Richardson Principals Juanita Brooks and Jon Singer Among California’s Top IP Lawyers
Press Release
News
September 7, 2017
Fish & Richardson Principal Martina Tyreus Hufnal Named 2017 “40 Under 40” Honoree by Delaware Business Times
Press Release
News
September 7, 2017
Fish & Richardson Wins Jury Verdict for Chamberlain Group
Press Release
Event
October 5th, 2017 | 8:00 am PDT
Daily Journal 2017 SoCal Patent Disputes Forum
Daily Journal 2017 SoCal Patent Disputes Forum
Speaking Engagement
Fish Litigation Blog
September 6, 2017
Mayo at Five: Eligibility of Diagnostic Method Claims
<i>Mayo</i> at Five: Eligibility of Diagnostic Method Claims
Authors: Megan A. Chacon, Dalia Kothari, Geoffrey D. Biegler
IP Litigation
Federal Circuit
Life Sciences
Fish Litigation Blog
September 5, 2017
Minnesota Patent Litigation Wrap-Up – August 2017
Minnesota Patent Litigation Wrap-Up – August 2017
Author: Conrad Gosen
IP Litigation
load more topics