Thought Leadership
Search results
Blog | October 25, 2010
Utah court: refuses to apply entire market value rule to lump-sum damages; finds no marking violation where unmarked products were not within scope of license
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | October 24, 2010
Inventor can testify as to factual basis for damages -- District of Utah
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | October 24, 2010
Pennsylvania court holds pre-licensing correspondence is relevant to damages and must be produced
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | October 07, 2010
Court instructs: If reasonably feasible, mark your product (and not just the packaging) with patent numbers -- otherwise, marking will be inadequate
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | October 01, 2010
Why a Compilation Copyright Registration May Not Be Enough to Protect Your Rights
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | August 31, 2010
See the recent article on Legislative patent damages reform published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | August 25, 2010
LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Storage America, Inc. et al. (2-06-cv-00348) TXED
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | August 18, 2010
Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. v. HemCon, Inc. (1-06-cv-00100) NHD
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Article | August 13, 2010
Read more
Runaway Patent Damages Awards: Is Statutory Reform on the Way?
The Los Angeles Daily Journal
Blog | August 05, 2010
ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al v. Diamond Innovations Inc (6-08-cv-00325) TXED
Fish & Richardson
Read more