Lawrence Kolodney on Contingent Fee Litigation

Authors

Name

Lawrence K. Kolodney

Person title

Principal

Fish attorney Lawrence Kolodney recently published an article in Corporate Counsel, where he dives into contingent fee litigation and why in-house counsel should consider it given its rising popularity in patent litigation.

To read the full article, click here.

The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.

Contingent Fee Litigation—A Low Risk Way to Enforce and Monetize Your Patents

Authors

The Return of Opinions of Counsel in Patent Cases: How Recent Judicial Decisions Have Made Them Relevant Once More

Patent Litigation for the Non-Specialist: How it Works and What to Expect

PTAB Decision Highlights Little Used Claim Amendment Process in America Invents Act Patent Challenges

Texas Round-Up: May 2025

Federal Circuit Reverses Injunction That Barred Clinical Trials in Jazz v. Avadel

Expert Testimony in an Era of Skepticism of Expertise

En Banc Federal Circuit Grants Google a New Trial in EcoFactor Case

Taking a Good Deposition, Part III: Conversations, Exhibits, Whether to Hold Your Fire at Deposition, and Dealing with Obstreperous Counsel

ITC Round-Up: Q1 2025

More Is More: Ensure Your Mark Is Protectable Before You Enforce

Can Clinical Trials Negate Patentability for Pharma Inventions?

Federal Circuit Finds Beer Trademark Application Nothing but "Chicken Scratch"

Munich Appeals Court Reinforces Security-Centric FRAND Framework in SEP Dispute