Article May 1, 2018
Law360: Celgard Can't Salvage Battery Patent Claims At Fed. Circ.
- Person title
- Person title
Fish Principals Kevin Wheeler, Michael McKeon, and Tim Riffe represented LG Chem in a longstanding patent dispute with Celgard LLC. The case was reported by Law360 in the December 2016 article “Celgard Can’t Salvage Battery Patent Claims At Fed. Circ.”.
The full article is available to Law360 subscribers. A summary of the case is also provided below.
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a Rule 36 judgment, affirming the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision to invalidate several claims in a Celgard LLC patent covering lithium battery technology, which had been asserted in district court against LG Chem Ltd.
The appeals court affirmed PTAB’s October 2015 decision that LG Chem had demonstrated numerous claims in the patent were made evident by previous inventions and were therefore invalid.
Celgard produces lithiumion battery parts for a variety of electronics, like computers, phones and electric vehicles. The subject of the patent dispute was a battery separator – a piece that allows the batteries to function but prevents the electrodes from coming in contact with one another.
Celgard sued LG Chem in 2014, alleging infringement of the patent. A district court judge granted a preliminary injunction, preventing LG Chem from supplying Apple Inc. and other companies with batteries that used the technology in dispute. The case quickly moved to the Federal Circuit, following the preliminary injunction order.
A year later, in August 2015, the appeals court reversed the preliminary injunction. In the meantime, with the assistance of Fish & Richardson, LG Chem filed a petition with PTAB seeking inter partes review of the patent. The petition contended that various claims were invalid. LG Chem was vindicated in a final written decision by the board, ruling that certain claims would have been obvious in light of two Japanese patent applications.
The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.
Article January 25, 2017
Michael McKeon interviewed in Metropolitan Corporate Counsel article "ITC's Powerful Patent Remedies"
Q&A January 3, 2017
Q&A with Michael McKeon: ITC's Powerful Patent Remedies
Blog February 11, 2016
PTAB's Skyrocketing Petition Rate Starts To Stabilize
Article October 21, 2014
Welcome To The Club: Advice From Old To New Partners
Q&A October 1, 2014
Q&A with Michael McKeon: Keeping Up With The ITC
Article July 17, 2014
9 Common Pitfalls With Post-Grant Proceedings
Q&A March 12, 2013
Q&A With Fish's Michael McKeon
Article June 21, 2011
Mike McKeon talks with Corporate Counsel: ITC Survey 2010: The Slugfest Continues