Insights
Search results
Blog | December 01, 2010
Detailed opinion on ongoing royalties from Arizona court
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | December 01, 2010
Judge Rader allows public access to trial testimony because of "increased interest" in patent damages methodologies
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | December 01, 2010
Prior settlement agreements not discoverable, rules California court; Kansas court takes different view
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | October 29, 2010
San Diego Court Awards Post-Judgment (Ongoing) Royalties and Supplemental Damages
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | October 25, 2010
Utah court: refuses to apply entire market value rule to lump-sum damages; finds no marking violation where unmarked products were not within scope of license
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | October 24, 2010
Inventor can testify as to factual basis for damages -- District of Utah
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | October 24, 2010
Pennsylvania court holds pre-licensing correspondence is relevant to damages and must be produced
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | October 07, 2010
Court instructs: If reasonably feasible, mark your product (and not just the packaging) with patent numbers -- otherwise, marking will be inadequate
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | August 31, 2010
See the recent article on Legislative patent damages reform published in the Los Angeles Daily Journal
Fish & Richardson
Read more
Blog | August 25, 2010
LaserDynamics, Inc. v. Quanta Storage America, Inc. et al. (2-06-cv-00348) TXED
Fish & Richardson
Read more