The title of the patent can be used to construe the claims. It should be a short (just a few words), broad description of the invention.
The inventors and where they reside.
The patent will list the owner of the patent, if the inventors have assigned their rights to a third party, e.g., their employer. This example does not have an assignee listed on the face of the patent.
Patent Term Extension or Adjustment
In the event of delay during prosecution or regulatory review, the term of the patent can be extended or adjusted. This can change how long the patent is in force. Delays caused by the applicant, like a request for an extension of time to respond, are not counted here. In this case, the patent’s term has not been extended or adjusted.
This was the application number at the Patent Office. It can be used for looking up further information about the application on the Patent Office’s website, called Public PAIR.
This is when the application was filed with the PTO.
Prior Publication Data
If the application was published by the Patent Office, this field will include the date and a publication number.
Invention Classifications and Fields of Examiner Search
The classifications place the invention in a category of similar inventions, identified by a number or letter combination. The fields of examiner search are the technical areas where the examiner looked for prior art.
Patent Documents of Record
These are the references the examiner looked at and considered when reviewing the patent. The U.S. Patent documents refer to patents and published applications that the examiner referenced.
Other Publications of Record
Other publications refer to non-patent documents that were considered by the Patent Office during the application’s prosecution.
The patent number, issued by the Patent Office.
The date the patent issued.
This is a short statement summarizing the invention.
The drawings provide a visual representation of the invention. They can include flow charts or diagrams. Software patents, for example, tend to include flow charts. Reference numerals refer to the elements described in the text of the patent, often referred to as the specification.
Field of the Invention
A general statement of the inventive technology.
Background of the Invention
A general discussion of previously known technology.
Summary of the Invention
A general discussion of the inventive technology, often with the claims re-written into standard prose.
Brief Description of the Drawings
This provides an overview of the subject matter illustrated in each drawing.
Description of the Invention
This provides a detailed description of the inventive technology with reference to the figures to help in understanding the technology.
These are the numbered paragraphs at the end of the patent. The claims define the subject matter that defines the invention. Put another way, the claims define the “metes and bounds” of property protected by the patent.
There are two basic types of claims – independent and dependent. Independent claims are standalone claims and do not refer to any other claims. Dependent claims refer to another claim. A dependent claim requires all the features explicitly recited in the dependent claim plus all the features recited in the claim(s) from which the dependent claim depends. Therefore, a dependent claim is said to be “narrower” than a claim from which it depends.
In this patent, claim 1 is an independent claim because it does not refer to any other claims. Claim 4, for example, is a dependent claim because it refers to claim 1. Thus, claim 4 requires the features explicitly recited in claim 4 plus the features recited in claim 1.
There are several different ways an inventor can claim her invention, including, for example, claiming the invention as an apparatus, a device, an article of manufacture (an object), a composition of matter, or a method. Typically, the first few words of a given claim tell you which way the inventor is using the claim to define her invention.
In this patent, claim 1 is an article of manufacture (an object), specifically “a Halloween treat carrier.” Claim 16 is a method claim, in particular “a method of decorating a pumpkin.”
The opinions expressed are those of the authors on the date noted above and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fish & Richardson P.C., any other of its lawyers, its clients, or any of its or their respective affiliates. This post is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is formed.
James Sebel is an associate in the litigation group in the Boston office of Fish & Richardson P.C. Mr. Sebel was previously a summer associate of the firm. During law school, he worked at the Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic, assisting technology companies in developing licensing agreements.
Sean P. Daley represents clients of various sizes, from emerging companies to major multinational corporations. His practice emphasizes strategic patent portfolio prosecution, development and management, freedom to operate studies, and patent-related opinions, due diligence, post-grant proceedings, and licensing. He has significant...