Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Zilabs Inc., Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., et al.

Area of Law:

Patent infringement

Grounds:

1) Defendant sought to exclude expert's reliance on litigation settlement license covering 100 patents as not economically comparable and not the most reliable license in the record. 2) Defendants sought to exclude expert's reliance on licensing negotiations that never resulted in executed licenses, and were not technically comparable. 3) Defendant sought to exclude apportionment based on surface area of accused element on the chip. 4) Defendants sought to exclude expert's testimony on several economic theories

Outcome:

Defendant's motion was granted-in-part as to all references to unconsummated license agreements and denied as to the remainder

Analysis:

View the analysis