Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
 
 
Appellate Image

Litigation

Post-Grant

Prosecution & Counseling

Appellate Law
Appellate Practice Brochure

Appeals involving complex intellectual property issues and technology law have increased dramatically. These complicated cases go to a handful of experienced firms that focus on this highly specialized work. In this elite group, Fish stands out.

Fish was recently named to the National Law Journal’s “Appellate Hot List” for significant appellate wins and an impressive overall track record. We have handled almost 150 appeals over the past five years covering a broad range of venues (district court, ITC, and PTAB), technologies (computer hardware, pharmaceutical, medical devices) on nearly every imaginable issue (validity, infringement, damages, standing, inventorship, and many more).

We provide to our clients the most experience and widest-ranging appellate practices in the country. For example, we have 25 former Federal Circuit clerks which allows us to provide an appellate team specifically tailored to the subject matter and issues on appeal. Furthermore, we are consistently called upon for our highly regarded amicus curiae counsel and have filed numerous amicus briefs in the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court for Fortune 500 clients.

Finally, Fish has been instrumental in shaping patent law through our work at the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Due to this experience, we have the unique ability to identify the best cases that can lead to these changes, spot important legal trends earlier, and position cases best for appeal.


Principal Frank Scherkenbach discusses the recent Teva matter


Featured Experience

Highlights

Search Fish Team

Search by Letter
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
No matches
Appellate

Appellate Team

What's Trending in Appellate

Filter by
Blog
January 29, 2016
The Federal Circuit trend to strengthen the standard for definiteness
Federal Circuit
IP Litigation
News
January 29, 2016
Fish & Richardson Named Law360 IP Practice Group of the Year for Fourth Straight Year
Press Releases
Blog
January 20, 2016
An Increased Emphasis on “Proportional Discovery”
Author: John B. Pegram
IP Litigation
News
January 11, 2016
Fish & Richardson Names Kurt Glitzenstein Leader of 250-Lawyer Litigation Group
Press Release
News
December 16, 2015
Lessons From Fed. Circ.’s 1st Wave of Post-Grant Appeals
Articles
News
November 19, 2015
Fish & Richardson Named to NLJ 2015 Appellate Hot List; Marks Fifth Year on Prestigious List
Press Releases
Blog
November 4, 2015
Pleading Patent Infringement Without Form 18
Author: David B. Conrad
IP Litigation
Blog
September 3, 2015
Legislative Patent Reform Debate to Resume as Congress Returns
Author: Michael M. Rosen
IP Litigation
Life Sciences
News
August 26, 2015
"Post Limelight, Could Patent Act Be More User-Friendly?"
Articles
Blog
July 27, 2015
Judicial Review Available for Decision that a Patent Qualified for CBM Review; § 101 Review Appropriate in CBM Review
Author: Rob Courtney
Federal Circuit
IP Litigation
Blog
July 24, 2015
District Courts Deciding Whether to Modify a Protective Order to Allow U.S. Discovery to Be Used in Foreign Litigation Must Consider Factors Relevant to Section 1782 Proceedings
Authors: Craig Countryman, Daniel A. Tishman
Federal Circuit
IP Litigation
Blog
July 22, 2015
Biosimilar Applicant Not Required to Disclose Application, But It Must Wait Until FDA Licensure to Provide Notice of Commercial Marketing And Cannot Launch for 180 Days Afterward
Author: Craig Countryman
Federal Circuit
IP Litigation
Life Sciences
load more topics