Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
 
 
Appellate Image

Litigation

Post-Grant

Prosecution & Counseling

Appellate Law
Appellate Practice Brochure

Appeals involving complex intellectual property issues and technology law have increased dramatically. These complicated cases go to a handful of experienced firms that focus on this highly specialized work. In this elite group, Fish stands out.

Fish was recently named to the National Law Journal’s “Appellate Hot List” for significant appellate wins and an impressive overall track record. We have handled almost 150 appeals over the past five years covering a broad range of venues (district court, ITC, and PTAB), technologies (computer hardware, pharmaceutical, medical devices) on nearly every imaginable issue (validity, infringement, damages, standing, inventorship, and many more).

We provide to our clients the most experience and widest-ranging appellate practices in the country. For example, we have 25 former Federal Circuit clerks which allows us to provide an appellate team specifically tailored to the subject matter and issues on appeal. Furthermore, we are consistently called upon for our highly regarded amicus curiae counsel and have filed numerous amicus briefs in the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court for Fortune 500 clients.

Finally, Fish has been instrumental in shaping patent law through our work at the Federal Circuit and the Supreme Court. Due to this experience, we have the unique ability to identify the best cases that can lead to these changes, spot important legal trends earlier, and position cases best for appeal.


Principal Frank Scherkenbach discusses the recent Teva matter


Featured Experience

Highlights

Search Fish Team

Search by Letter
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
No matches
Appellate

Appellate Team

What's Trending in Appellate

Filter by
News
July 1, 2015
"Patent Dance Takes Center Stage in Amgen v. Sandoz Appeal"
Articles
IP Updates
Blog
June 29, 2015
Patent Term Adjustment Obtained for PTO Delay During a Parent Application Does Not Also Apply to Subsequent Divisional or Continuation Applications
Author: Craig Countryman
Federal Circuit
Blog
June 29, 2015
Remand Required for an Order That Denied Attorney Fees Based on a Clearly Erroneous Misconduct Finding
Author: Craig Countryman
Federal Circuit
Blog
June 25, 2015
Predictions for the Outcome of Amgen v. Sandoz
Author: Terry G. Mahn
Federal Circuit
Life Sciences
Blog
June 24, 2015
Section 121’s Safe Harbor Precludes a Double-Patenting Defense Against Only Claims In the Application A Restriction Was Made or a Divisional of It
Author: Craig Countryman
Federal Circuit
Blog
June 24, 2015
Claims to Generic Method and System for Using a Web Browser’s Back and Forward Buttons Without Data Loss Are Not Patent Eligible
Author: Craig Countryman
Federal Circuit
Blog
June 24, 2015
“Means” Term Not Subject to 112(6) Because of Deference to District Court’s Factual Findings; No Waiver Where Claim Construction Argument Was Raised at the Markman Stage But Not Renewed at Trial or in a JMOL Motion
Author: Craig Countryman
Federal Circuit
Blog
June 23, 2015
SCOTUS: Post-expiration patent royalties are (still) unlawful per se
Author: Michael Kevin Henry, PhD
IP Litigation
Blog
June 18, 2015
Ordered Method Claim Does Not Bar Partly-Simultaneous Performance of Steps
Author: Rob Courtney
IP Litigation
Blog
June 17, 2015
Claims Covering Basic Detection of Naturally-Occurring Compound, However Scientifically Significant, Not Patent Eligible
Author: Rob Courtney
Federal Circuit
Blog
June 17, 2015
PTAB Decision Highlights Little Used Claim Amendment Process in America Invents Act Patent Challenges
Author: Lawrence K. Kolodney
IP Litigation
Blog
June 11, 2015
Use of Generic Computer Functions to Make Traditional Economic Method More Efficient Does Not Confer Patent Eligibility
Author: Rob Courtney
Federal Circuit
load more topics