Thad Kodish is Managing Principal of Fish & Richardson’s Atlanta Office. In addition, Mr. Kodish is a patent trial lawyer and leads cases in venues across the United States, including the Eastern District of Texas, the Northern District of California, and the Northern District of Georgia. An experienced courtroom lawyer, Mr. Kodish has first-chaired for some of the firm’s largest clients, including at Markman and at the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, and is otherwise on the front lines of his cases.
Mr. Kodish argued successfully as first chair for Samsung Electronics in Synchrome LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., which led to the plaintiff’s later stipulation of non-infringement and favorable settlement. His hands-on approach includes a deep understanding of his clients’ business, and business objectives, allowing him to quickly provide clients with targeted guidance on vital issues and opportunities that arise during the course of patent litigation.
His cases span a wide range of electrical, computer software, chemical and mechanical technologies, microprocessors, Ethernet and wireless network communications, operating system software, product activation software, telecommunications systems, computer storage devices, point-of-sale software and hardware, computer-aided design, wearable software and hardware, as well as textile and laminate flooring technologies.
As a result of his many longstanding client relationships, Mr. Kodish routinely provides counsel and guidance at all stages of a legal dispute. Thus, clients frequently consult with him even before a lawsuit is filed to work on sensitive and highly confidential pre-suit matters, including offensive and defensive strategies for litigation avoidance.
Along the litigation continuum, Mr. Kodish has briefed and argued appeals for clients on issues that include claim construction, infringement, validity, and patent office practice. Mr. Kodish argued successfully on appeal in Shaw Industries Group Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems Inc., leading to a decision limiting the scope of estoppel stemming from IPR proceedings, that Law 360 hailed as one of the “Top Patent Cases of 2016.” Many commentators predict that this decision will have far-ranging effects for years to come.
Since the 2011 enactment of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA), Mr. Kodish has broadened his practice to integrate strategies that incorporate post-grant proceedings, including inter partes review (IPR). He has successfully litigated IPRs for both the patent owner and the patent challenger, in diverse fields ranging from computer software to manufacturing.
In addition to his patent litigation practice, Mr. Kodish has extensive involvement at the Emory School of Law. Mr. Kodish was the Adjunct Professor of Law teaching the course on Patent Litigation in the 2016 spring semester. Mr. Kodish has also been a member of the Law School Alumni Board for nearly ten years, including his two-year term as Alumni Board and Alumni Association President (2013-2015)
Prior to joining Fish, he was a chemical engineer at Pratt & Whitney Aircraft responsible for chemical technologies for jet engines.
TiVo, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al (E.D. Tex. 2015-16) (Judge Gilstrap) Counsel for Samsung in patent dispute regarding set-top box technologies.
Uniloc USA Inc., et al. v. McKesson Corp., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2016) (Judge Schroeder) Lead counsel for McKesson in patent dispute regarding computer software technologies.
Freeny, et al. v. AliphCom Inc., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2016) (Judge Gilstrap) Lead counsel for Fitbit in patent dispute regarding wearable technologies.
Fujinomaki v. Google Inc., et al. (N.D. Cal. 2015-16) Counsel for Samsung in case successfully transferred from the Eastern District of Texas concerning wearable technologies
Shaw Industries Group Inc. v. Automated Creel Systems Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2016) Counsel for Shaw Industries arguing successfully on several issues regarding invalidity and PTAB procedure
Olivistar, LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (E.D. Tex. 2014) (Judge Gilstrap) Counsel for Samsung in patent dispute regarding computer networking technologies.
Presqriber, LLC v. McKesson Corporation (E.D. Tex. 2014) (Judge Mitchell) Counsel for McKesson in patent dispute regarding electronic prescribing technologies.
Ingeniador, LLC v. McKesson Corporation (E.D. Tex. 2013)(Judge Gilstrap) Counsel for McKesson in patent dispute regarding digital health technology.
Clark Equipment Company v. Corriher (N.D. Ga. 2012-13)(Judge Story) Counsel for Clark Equipment Co. in trademark dispute alleging improper use of Clark’s BOBCAT trademarks.
Automated Creel Systems, Inc. v. Shaw Industries Group, Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2012)(Judge Story) Counsel for Shaw Industries in a patent dispute involving carpet manufacturing technologies.
U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC. v. Acer, Inc., et al. (N.D. Cal. 2011-2013)(Chief Judge Wilken) Counsel for large semiconductor manufacturer in a patent dispute involving Ethernet adapter technologies.
Synchrome Technology, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics America, et al. (N.D. Ga. 2009-2014)(Judge Jones) Counsel for Samsung in patent infringement action concerning disk drive technology.
HTTP Hypothermia Therapy, LTD. v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation, et al. (Fulton County Superior Court) (2012-2013) Testifying expert for Kimberly-Clark on patent law issues.
SIPCO, LLC v. Control4 Corp., et. al. (N.D. Ga. 2010-2012)(Chief Judge Carnes) Represented Digi International, Inc. in dispute involving wireless networking technologies.
Lutron Electronics Co. Inc. v. Pass and Seymour Inc., et al. (C.D. Cal. 2011-12) Represented Pass & Seymour in patent infringement case regarding electrical dimmer switch technology.
Greenlight Technologies LLC v. Anigmo LLC (dba Anigmo), et al. (2010-2011) Represented Pass & Seymour in patent infringement matter concerning electrical dimmer switch circuitry.
Akzenta Profile et al. v. Shaw Industries Group, Inc., et. al. (E.D. Tex. 2010-2012) (Judge Ward) Represented Shaw Industries in dispute involving laminate flooring technologies.
SIPCO, LLC, v. Johnson Controls, Inc., et. al. (E.D. Tex. 2009-2011) (Judge Davis) Represented Johnson Controls, Inc. in dispute involving wireless networking technologies.
Mesh Comm LLC v. Landis+Gyr, Inc. and Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC (E.D. Tex. 2009-2010) (Judge Ward) Represented defendants Landis+Gyr and Oncor in dispute involving networking technologies.
Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Interface, Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2005-2009) Represented Shaw Industries in action for declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of carpet tile patent.
Shaw Industries Group, Inc. v. Interface, Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2007-2009) Represented Shaw Industries in action for false patent marking.
Toni & Guy, USA v. Nature Lab’s (N.D. Tex. 2008-2009) Represented Toni & Guy in action for trademark and trade dress infringement.
IP CO, LLC and SIPCO, LLC v. Cellnet Technology, Inc. and Hunt Technologies, et al. (N.D. Ga. 2007-2009) Represented Cellnet and Hunt in contract dispute and patent infringement matter concerning wireless mesh networking technology.
American Valve v. Asia Factory Direct, et al. (D. Nev. 2008) Obtained temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in trademark dispute for American Valve.
Fulks v. Chaparral Boats, Inc., et al. (E.D. Tex. 2002-2004) and Fulks v. Crownline Boats (E.D. Tex. 2006-2007) Represented Chaparral and Crownline in patent infringement matters involving structural designs for power boats.
Milliken & Co. v. Shaw Industries Group, Inc., et al. (D.S.C. 2000-2002) Represented Shaw Industries in patent infringement action involving construction of carpet backing.
SuperGuide Corp. v. DIRECTV Enterprises, Inc., EchoStar Technologies, Inc., Thomson Consumer Electronics, Inc. v. Gemstar Development Corp. (W.D N.C. 2001) Represented EchoStar in complex patent infringement litigation involving three patents owned by SuperGuide, licensed to Gemstar in certain fields of use, and directed to various aspects of interactive program guides (IPG) software and systems used in Satellite television services.
May 19, 2015
Fish & Richardson Receives Top “Band 1” National Rankings for Intellectual Property and ITC Practices from Chambers USA 2015
June 8, 2016
Fish Receives Top “Band 1” National Rankings for Intellectual Property and ITC Practices in Chambers USA 2016
June 2, 2016
Fish & Richardson Announces 37 Attorneys Named “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property Magazine
July 8, 2014
Fish Announces 39 Attorneys Named “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property Magazine
June 11, 2014
Fish Receives Top “Band 1” National Rankings for Intellectual Property and ITC Practices from Chambers USA 2014
March 1, 2014
Fish's Thad Kodish Talks to Emory School of Law About Diversity at Law School and at Law Firms
February 7, 2014
Fish & Richardson Announces 17 Attorneys Selected for 2014 Chambers USA
June 11, 2013
Fish & Richardson Receives Top 2013 “Band 1” Rankings from Chambers USA in Intellectual Property and International Trade
May 15, 2013
Forty Fish & Richardson Attorneys Named “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property Magazine
April 15, 2013
Fish's Thad Kodish Interviewed by the Fulton County Daily Report on the Issue of Lateral Hiring
June 7, 2012
Fish Receives Top 2012 “Band 1” Rankings from Chambers USA in Intellectual Property and International Trade
July 5, 2011
Fish & Richardson Receives Top 2011 “Band 1” Rankings from Chambers USA in Intellectual Property and International Trade