Search Tips:
1. Search Adjacent Words - Place quotes around the exact keyword phrase you want to search. Ex: "regulatory environments"
2. Search in Title Only - Type title: and surround the search terms in quotations to specifically search in titles. Ex: title:"regulatory environments" close
|
Michael
J.
McKeon
Principal
202-626-6448
Michael McKeon is a Principal in the Washington, D.C. office of Fish & Richardson and a member of the firm's Management Committee.
Mr. McKeon is a highly respected trial and litigation attorney with numerous awards and honors including being listed by U.S. News Best Lawyers for Litigation – Patent (2008-2012) and being selected to Washington, D.C. Super Lawyers (2011-2012). Mr. McKeon also has been recognized in IAM Patent Litigation 250 – The World’s Leading Patent Litigators (2010), The Lawdragon Leading Lawyers in America (2010), AsiaLaw Leading Lawyers (2008 & 2009). Mr. McKeon was also featured in The American Lawyer representing Fish & Richardson as a finalist for IP Litigation Department of the Year (2010). In addition, Mr. McKeon has been featured in Chambers USA for both Intellectual Property and ITC Section 337 cases. Mr. McKeon's national trial practice focuses on high technology litigation and he has extensive experience in electrical technologies including telecommunications, semiconductors, and a wide variety of consumer electronics. Mr. McKeon represents some of the world's most well-known technology companies, often in their most important, high stake patent infringement cases. Mr. McKeon serves as lead counsel to both plaintiffs and defendants. He is experienced in matters before Federal District Courts, the United States International Trade Commission, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Mr. McKeon has successfully tried numerous jury and bench trials in courts throughout the country with a particular focus on E.D. Texas, D. Del. and E.D. Va. He has deep experience in matters before the United States International Trade Commission having successfully tried and litigated dozens of cases there.
After graduation from engineering school in 1990, Mr. McKeon started his intellectual property career as a Patent Examiner with the United States Patent and Trademark Office and continued to work full-time while attending law school in the evenings at the George Washington University Law School. Mr. McKeon was a Judicial Clerk to the Honorable William C. Bryson of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Mr. McKeon has been with Fish & Richardson since completing his clerkship where he has been instrumental in the firm’s growth from 120 lawyers in a few offices to over 400 in eleven offices nationwide.
Mr. McKeon is an Adjunct Professor at the George Washington University Law School where he is teaching the first law school class in the country dedicated to Section 337 cases before the U.S. International Trade Commission (co-teaching with Judge Theodore R. Essex). Mr. McKeon is also active in numerous professional organizations including the Federal Circuit Bar Association (where he is Co-Chair of the Patent and Trademark Office Committee) and the Intellectual Property Owners Association (where he serves on the International Trade Commission Committee).
Admissions
-
United States Patent and Trademark Office
1994
-
New York
1997
-
District of Columbia
1998
-
Virginia
Government Services
Patent Examiner, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
1990
-
1993
Clerkships
-
The Honorable William C. Bryson,
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,
1996 - 1997
Other Distinctions
Selected publications and presentations
Mr. McKeon is a frequent lecturer on district court and ITC litigation and trial practice. Mr. McKeon’s lectures, publications, and appearances include:
“Thriving in Markman Hearings” (23rd Annual All Hands Meeting - Silicon Valley Association of General Counsel) (scheduled for December 7, 2011)
“Alternatives to District Court Litigation - Section 337 Proceedings in the ITC,” 2010 IPO Annual Meeting (September 14, 2010 - Atlanta)
"Master Class: Enforcement of ITC Exclusion Orders," American Conference Institute, ITC Litigation and Enforcement (February 24-26, 2010 – New York)
"ITC Update: Remedies, Enforcement & Other Developments," 14th Annual Advanced Patent Law Institute,” The University of Texas School of Law (October 30, 2009 - Austin).
"Kyocera Decision and its Implications for Future Section 337 Practice," ITC Trial Lawyers Association (May 6, 2009 – Washington, D.C.).
"E-Discovery: What You Need to Know To Avoid Sanctions, Protect Your Information and Minimize Costs" (June, 2008 – Seoul, Korea ).
"Current Issues Surrounding Patent Eligibility under 35 U.S.C. 101 – Government, Academic and Private Sector Perspective," The Federal Circuit Bar Association (May 22, 2008 – Washington, D.C.).
"Strategies for Enforcing and Defending Intellectual Property Rights," National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (November, 2007 – Las Vegas, Nevada).
"The Current State of Re-Exams at the USPTO," The Federal Circuit Bar Association (September 13, 2007 – Washington, D.C.).
"Veni, Vidi, Vici: Conquering Your Adversaries in the United States Patent Litigation Battle" (December 12, 2006 - Seoul, Korea).
"Advantages of a Section 337 Investigation at the US International Trade Commission," IP Litigator, Vol. 12, No. 3 (May/June 2006) (co-author).
"Patent Reform & Legislative Changes on the Horizon" (November, 2005 – Seoul, Korea).
"The Eastern District of Texas: The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly of the New Patent Litigation Frontier" (November 2, 2005 – Seoul, Korea).
"The Patent Marking and Notice Statute: A Question of 'Fact' or 'Act'?" Harv. J. of Law & Tech., 9, 421 (Summer 1996) (Finnegan Award).
"Lotus v. Borland: Copyright Protection of Computer Software in a State of Transition," Copyright World, 53, 16 (September 1995).
Additional information Mr. McKeon was born and raised in Niantic, Connecticut. He now lives with his wife in Alexandria, Virginia. Mr. McKeon is a running enthusiast (including completing many marathons).
Education
-
BS,
University of Connecticut
1990
Mechanical Engineering, Materials Engineering
magna cum laude
-
JD,
George Washington University Law School
1996
with highest honors (top 1%), Order of the Coif
Experience
Litigation examples
By way of example, a listing of some of Mr. McKeon's cases is set forth below.
Patent infringement (District court): Zenith Electronics LLC v. Sony Corporation, et al. (E.D. Tex./N.D. Ca./N.D. Ill.) – Represented Zenith Electronics LLC in a patent case against Sony Corporation relating to digital television receivers.
LG Electronics, Inc. v. Sony Corporation (SDCA/CDCA) – Represented LGE in a patent case against Sony relating to Blu-ray disc players and digital television products.
Spansion LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (E.D. Va./WD Wisc.) – Represented Samsung Electronics in a patent case related to Flash memory.
Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al (E.D. Tex.) –Defended Amazon.com, Inc. in a patent case accusing Amazon.com’s popular e-Commerce website and Kindle products.
Vizio, Inc. v. LG Electronics (D. MD) – Defended LGE in patent case accusing LGE’s digital televisions.
Hitachi Plasma Patent Licensing Co. v. LG Electronics, Inc. (E.D. Tex.) – Defended LGE in a patent case accusing LGE’s plasma televisions.
International Business Machine Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (E.D. Tex.) -- Defended Amazon.com in a patent case accusing Amazon.com's popular Internet shopping website.
Harvey v. Apple Inc. (E.D. Tex) – Defended Apple in a patent case accusing Apple’s popular laptop products.
LG Electronics, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. (E.D. Tex.) – Represented LGE in a patent case against Hitachi relating to car audio/visual and navigation products.
Quantum Technology v. Apple Inc. (D. Md.) -- Defended Apple in a patent case brought by Quantum Technology accusing touch technology used in Apple's laptops and iPods.
Antor Media Corporation v. LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA, Inc. (E.D. Tex.) -- Defended LGE in a patent case accusing to content downloads to mobile phones.
Zoltar Satellite Systems, Inc. v. LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA, Inc. (E.D. Tex/ND Cal.) -- Defended LGE in a patent case accusing e911 systems in mobile phone networks.
Charles E. Hill & Associates v. AOL et al. (E.D. Tex.) -- Defended AOL Time Warner, Inc. in a patent case accusing its on-line shopping services.
Ciena Corporation v. Corvis Corporation (D. Del.) -- Represented Ciena in patent infringement case relating to dense wave division multiplexing optical communications systems.
Toshiba Corporation v. Juniper Networks, Inc et al. (D. Del.) -- Defended Juniper in a patent case relating to router technology.
Cargill, Incorporated v. Canbra Foods, Ltd., Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc., and Dow AgroSciences LLC (D. Oregon) -- Represented Cargill in a patent case relating to specialty canola oil.
Microsoft v. Ultimate Game Club, Ltd. (D. Conn.) -- Represented Microsoft in a patent case relating to its XBOX video game system.
Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. v. Covad Communications (E.D. Va.) -- Defended Covad Communications in a patent case relating to DSL technology.
Scripps International, Ltd. v. First Alert, Inc. (E.D. Va.) -- Represented Scripps International in a patent infringement case relating to alarm systems.
Siemens Business Communication Systems v. Harris Corporation (E.D. Va.) -- Represented Siemens in patent infringement case relating to telecommunications switching equipment.
Section 337 Investigations - International Trade Commission: Certain Electronic Devices Having A Digital Television Receiver and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-774) - Represented Complainant Zenith Electronics Ltd. against Sony entities seeking exclusion of Sony digital television receivers.
Certain Display Devices, Including Digital Televisions and Monitors II (Inv. No. 337-TA-765) - Defended Respondent LGE against patent infringement claims brought by Sony Electronics seeking exclusion of LGE’s digital television products.
Certain Digital Televisions and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-764) - Represented Complainant LGE against Sony entities seeking exclusion of Sony digital television products.
Certain Mobile Telephones and Modems (Inv. No. 337-TA-758) – Defended respondent LG Electronics in patent case brought by complainant Sony Corp. seeking to exclude LGE’s mobile products implementing standard-based wireless technologies (UMTS/WCDMA, LTE, and CDMA2000).
Certain Flash Memory Chips and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-735)- Defended respondent Samsung Electronics against patent infringement claims brought by Spansion LLC seeking exclusion of Samsung’s NAND Flash Memory Chips and downstream products containing those chips manufactured by Samsung and Samsung customers.
Certain Flat Panel Digital Televisions and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-733) -- represented respondents LG Electronics in a patent case brought by Vizio seeking exclusion of LGE’s digital televisions implements QAM standard transmission technology.
Certain Video Displays, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. ITC Inv. 337-TA-687) – Represented Complainant LG Electronics seeking exclusion of digital televisions imported by Vizio, Inc. and AmTran.
Certain Mobile Telephones and Wireless Communication Devices Featuring Cameras, and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-663) – Defended Respondent LG Electronics against patent infringement claims brought by Eastman Kodak seeking exclusion of LGE’s popular cellular telephone products.
Certain Electronic Devices Having Image Capture or Display Functionality and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-672) – Represented Complainant LG Electronics against Eastman Kodak seeking exclusion of Kodak’s digital camera products.
Certain Flash Memory Devices and Components Thereof, and Products Containing Such Devices and Components (Inv. No. 337-TA-552) -- Defended respondent Hynix Semiconductor against patent infringement claims brought by Toshiba Corp. seeking exclusion of Hynix’ Flash memory products.
Certain Semiconductor Devices, DMA Systems, and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-607) -- Represented Complainant Samsung Electronics against Renesas Technology in a patent case relating to semiconductors and DMA systems.
Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Devices and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-595) -- Defended Respondent Samsung Electronics against patent infringement claims brought by Renesas Technology Corp. seeking exclusion of Samsung’s DRAM products.
Certain Baseband Processor Chips and Chipsets, Transmitter and Receiver (Radio) Chips, Power Control Chips, and Products Containing Same, including Cellular Telephone Handsets (Inv. No. 337-TA-543) – Represented LG Electronics as an intervenor in a case brought by Broadcom Corp. against Qualcomm accusing Qualcomm's baseband processor chips, which are components used in LGE's cellular telephone handsets.
Certain Display Controllers and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-491) -- Represented complainant Genesis Microchip in a patent case against a number of Taiwanese companies seeking exclusion of display controller chips and downstream monitors containing the chips.
Certain Video Game Systems, Accessories, And Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-473) -- Represented complainant Microsoft in a patent case seeking exclusion of products employing features from XBOX video game system.
Certain CMOS Active Pixel Image Sensors and Products Containing Same - (Inv. No. 337-TA-451) -- Represented complainants Photobit Corporation and Caltech in a patent case seeking exclusion of camera products employing active pixel sensors.
Certain Video Graphics Display Controllers and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-412) -- Defended respondent ATI Technologies against patent infringement claims brought by Cirrus Logic, Inc. seeking exclusion of ATI’s display controller chips.
Certain Optical Waveguide Fibers and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-410) -- Defended respondent Plasma Optical Fibre (from the Netherlands) in a patent case brought by Corning seeking exclusion of fiber optic cables.
Trade secrets/Copyright: MicroStrategy Incorporated v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc. (E.D. Va.) -- Represented MicroStrategy in a copyright infringement action relating to its database mining software.
ZeoSync Corporation v. DPS Technologies (S.D.N.Y.) -- Represented ZeoSync in a trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract action relating to data compression software.
Ciena v. Chromatis Networks (Circuit Court MD) -- Represented Ciena in a trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract action relating to its dense wavelength division multiplexing equipment. Obtained TRO and preliminary injunction after full evidentiary hearing.
Alcatel v. Hackers (N.D. Ind.) -- Represented Alcatel in a trade secret misappropriation and copyright infringement action relating to its telecommunications switching equipment. Obtained TRO and seizure order – guided US Marshals in property raid; obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions.
Alcatel v. IPOptical (E.D. Va.) -- Represented Alcatel in a trade secret misappropriation and copyright infringement action relating to its telecommunications switching equipment. Obtained TRO and preliminary injunctions.
DSC Communications v. Shivers (D. Md. ) -- Represented Alcatel in a trade secret misappropriation and copyright infringement action relating to its telecommunications switching equipment. Obtained TRO and seizure order, and preliminary and permanent injunctions.
|
|