Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
 

Background

​Chris W. Dryer is an Associate in the Washington, D.C., office of Fish & Richardson, where his practice focuses on patent litigation. From 2012-2013, Mr. Dryer clerked for the Honorable Timothy B. Dyk at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Education

J.D., Georgetown University Law Center 2011
Article Editor, The Georgetown Law Journal
magna cum laude, Order of the Coif


B.S., University of Mary Washington 2004
Computer Science

Admissions

  • District of Columbia 2014

Clerkships

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, The Honorable Timothy B. Dyk, 2012 - 2013

Services

What's trending with Chris

Filter by
Fish Litigation Blog
March 12, 2015
Ambiguous Phrase in Claims Not Indefinite Where Intrinsic Evidence Resolves the Ambiguity
Authors: Michael C. Tyler, Chris W. Dryer
Federal Circuit
Fish Litigation Blog
June 8, 2016
Jury May Infer Intent to Induce Infringement Where Alleged Belief in Noninfringement Is Based on Objectively Unreasonable Reading of Claims
Jury May Infer Intent to Induce Infringement Where Alleged Belief in Noninfringement Is Based on Objectively Unreasonable Reading of Claims
Author: Chris W. Dryer
IP Litigation
Federal Circuit
Fish Litigation Blog
May 13, 2015
Standing To Assert False Marking Requires That Plaintiff At Least Attempted To Enter The Market
Authors: Michael C. Tyler, Chris W. Dryer
Federal Circuit
Fish Litigation Blog
April 28, 2015
The PTO’s Refusal To Terminate Reexamination Proceedings In Light Of District Court Settlement Is Not Immediately Reviewable In Court
Authors: Michael C. Tyler, Chris W. Dryer
Federal Circuit
Fish Litigation Blog
March 4, 2015
Judge Essex Recommends General Exclusion Order for Counterfeit Loom Kits
Judge Essex Recommends General Exclusion Order for Counterfeit Loom Kits
Authors: Chris W. Dryer, Andrew R. Kopsidas
ITC Litigation
Fish Litigation Blog
February 26, 2015
Patent Exhaustion Inapplicable To Practice of Related But Separate Invention by Third Parties Interacting with Licensed Products
Authors: Michael C. Tyler, Chris W. Dryer
Federal Circuit
Fish Litigation Blog
December 23, 2014
Rule 12(b)(6) Inappropriate for Resolving Fact-Intensive Trade Secret Claims
Authors: Michael C. Tyler, Chris W. Dryer
IP Litigation
Federal Circuit
Trade Secrets
Fish Litigation Blog
December 23, 2014
To Add Claims to a Separate Invention on Reissue, the Specification Must Clearly and Unequivocally Disclose the Newly Claimed Invention as a Separate Invention
Authors: Michael C. Tyler, Chris W. Dryer
IP Litigation
Federal Circuit
Fish Litigation Blog
December 3, 2014
ITC’s Authority to Enforce Consent Orders Extends to Importations by Third Parties
Authors: Michael C. Tyler, Chris W. Dryer
IP Litigation
Federal Circuit
ITC Litigation
Fish Litigation Blog
December 3, 2014
Infringement Suit Must Target United States Where Private Entity is Legally Required to Perform Quasi-Governmental Functions
Authors: Michael C. Tyler, Chris W. Dryer
IP Litigation
Federal Circuit
load more topics