Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Q&A with Sheryl Garko: Empowered by IP

May 17, 2017

Q&A with Sheryl Garko: Empowered by IP

May 17, 2017

Back to Q&A Listing

 

Intellectual property litigator Sheryl Koval Garko was interviewed by Metropolitan Corporate Counsel in the May 2017 article “Empowered by IP.” In the interview, Ms. Garko talks about the differences between litigating in the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and district court, as well as her recent success for New Balance in an influential trademark case decided by the ITC. She also comments on the firm’s women’s initiative, EMPOWER, and how it has supported her career.

MCC: You helped win a closely watched ITC trademark case last year for New Balance that has upended trademark law and continues to be litigated in the courts on appeal. What is the story behind that case, and where do things stand now?

Garko: Converse sued 31 respondents claiming infringement of its purported trade dress in its Chuck Taylor sneakers – specifically its combination of a toe cap, toe bumper and midsole stripes. New Balance intervened in that action to protect its well-known PF Flyers brand, which has been around since the 1950s. The trial took place in August 2015 and a final determination was issued on June 23, 2016, which found in favor of New Balance. The ITC found that the claimed trademark asserted by Converse against New Balance was invalid – meaning Converse did not have trademark rights to the claimed design elements.

We were able to show that consumers did not think that the combination of the toe cap, toe bumper and midsole stripes on the Chuck Taylor were themselves source-identifying – meaning that the vast majority of consumers would not look at only those elements and understand that meant the shoe was a Converse sneaker. While Converse has sold a lot of Chucks and advertised them heavily, it has not directed its efforts to the particular design elements at issue. Additionally, we were able to demonstrate that many companies over the years sold sneakers with the same combination of elements, so consumers would not be led to understand that those elements are associated with a single source. I think this is an important lesson for companies that want to claim specific elements of their overall product design as trade dress. Simply advertising the product as a whole is not enough. You need to call consumers’ attention specifically to what you claim as your trademark.

This was a major victory for our client and other shoe companies and retailers involved in the case that asserted that Converse was trying to monopolize common sneaker designs. IPLaw360 identified the matter as the top trademark ruling of 2016, noting that the win “marked a big setback for Converse’s aggressive campaign to protect its Chuck Taylor sneaker.” The case is currently being briefed on appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.”

Attorney Bio

Headshot
Sheryl Koval Garko | Principal

Sheryl Koval Garko is an experienced trial lawyer who focuses on trademark, copyright, and trade secret litigation. Clients hire Sheryl for her creative, strategic, business-focused advice enriched by her extensive courtroom experience and working knowledge of a wide range of technologies. For almost 15 years, she has represented clients...

Filter by
News
February 2, 2018
Fish & Richardson Named Top Trademark Law Firm for Eighth Straight Year by World Trademark Review
Press Release
News
May 17, 2017
Fish's Sheryl Garko Interviewed in Metropolitan Corporate Counsel Article, "Empowered by IP"
Media Mention
News
August 15, 2018
46 Fish Attorneys Named to The Best Lawyers in America® 2019 List
Articles
Event
April 12th, 2018 | 8:30 am EDT
Consero: IP Executive Roundtable for Life Sciences
Consero: IP Executive Roundtable for Life Sciences
Speaking Engagement
Sponsorship
Event
November 30th, 2017 | 1:00 pm EST
Webinar: Enforcing Non-Patent Intellectual Property Rights at the ITC
Webinar: Enforcing Non-Patent Intellectual Property Rights at the ITC
Webinar
Event
October 17th, 2017 | 8:00 am EDT
2017 ChIPs Global Summit: Mock Pitch Exercise
2017 ChIPs Global Summit: Mock Pitch Exercise
Sponsorship
News
August 22, 2017
Fish & Richardson Announces Four Principals Named 2017 “Women Worth Watching” by Profiles in Diversity Journal
Press Release
Q&A
May 17, 2017
Q&A with Sheryl Garko: Empowered by IP
Q&A with Sheryl Garko
Author: Sheryl Koval Garko
Life at Fish
Litigation
Patent
IP
Diversity
ITC
News
January 25, 2017
Fish & Richardson Named Top Trademark Law Firm for Seventh Straight Year by World Trademark Review
Press Release
Media Mention
News
December 20, 2016
Trademark Litigation: A Global Guide 2017
Articles
Event
April 12th, 2016 | 1:00 pm EDT
Webinar: Using the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool
Webinar: Using the ITC as a Trademark Enforcement Tool
Webinar
Event
March 31st, 2015 | 1:00 pm EDT
Trademark & Copyright Webinar – Copyright Infringement and Fair Use: Latest Developments
Speaking Engagement
Webinar
load more topics