Scott Elengold is a Principal in the Washington, DC, office of Fish & Richardson. His practice emphasizes patent litigation in federal appellate and district courts and before the United States International Trade Commission across a broad range of technical areas including computer hardware and software, wireless telecommunications, microprocessors, hybrid vehicles, and internet technologies. Mr. Elengold has litigated numerous cases in federal courts and agencies, including the Eastern District of Texas, the District of Delaware, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and the United States International Trade Commission. Mr. Elengold is the Recruiting Principal for the Washington, DC office.
Mr. Elengold was previously a Judicial Clerk for the Honorable Raymond C. Clevenger, III, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2009-2011). He also worked as an Associate and Summer Associate for Fish & Richardson (2004-2009). Mr. Elengold has technical experience as a Consultant working on large scale application development and computer system design with Accenture (1999-2002).
Microsoft Corp. v. St. Clair Intellectual Property Consultants, Inc. (D. Del.) – Representing Microsoft in multi-patent declaratory judgment case involving power management technology. Case pending.
Fenner Investment, Ltd v. Microsoft Corporation et al. (E.D. Tex.) – Represented Microsoft in patent infringement case involving joystick port interface circuits. Won summary judgment of noninfringement one day before trial.
International Business Machine Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (E.D. Tex.) – Represented Amazon.com against IBM’s infringement allegations regarding Amazon.com’s popular Internet shopping website. Case settled favorably for Amazon.com soon after it served its invalidity contentions against IBM’s patents.
Paice LLC v. Toyota Motor Corp. et. al. (E.D. Tex.). Represented plaintiff-patentee Paice LLC in cases related to control systems for hybrid electric vehicles. Obtained jury verdict of infringement and no invalidity, and a past damages award of over $ 5 million. In damages aspect of case remanded for additional proceedings related to ongoing royalty, jury’s per car royalty award was quadrupled.
Digital Packet Licensing Inc. v. MCI, Inc. et al. (E.D. Tex.) – Represented Time Warner Cable in patent infringement case involving digital packet telephone systems and voice over IP technology. Favorable early settlement.
Section 337 Investigations – International Trade Commission
Certain Wireless Consumer Electronics Devices and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-853 – Representing LG in ITC investigation against complainants TPL, Patriot Scientific, and Phoenix Digital System and their infringement assertion of a patent related to variable speed system clocks in microprocessors. After a seven-day trial in the ITC, the Administrative Law Judge issued an initial determination in September 2013 in which he found that LG did not infringe the asserted patent claims. Although the complainants challenged the ALJ’s initial determination, the full Commission issued a determination in February 2013 that affirmed the ALJ’s ruling of noninfringement in LG’s favor.
Certain Computer Products, Computer Components and Products Containing Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-628) – Represented respondents ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. and ASUS Computer International in a patent litigation proceeding involving products implementing power supplies, variable speed fans, and network address port translation. Obtained favorable settlement.
Certain InkJet Ink Supplies (Inv. No. 337-TA-581) – Represented complainant Hewlett-Packard Company in patent litigation proceeding related to inkjet print components. Obtained favorable settlement.
Certain Flash Memory Devices and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-552). Represented respondent Hynix Semiconductor, Inc. in patent litigation proceeding related to flash memory devices. Final Determination of noninfringement of both asserted patents.
Certain Baseband Processor Chips and Chipsets, Transmitter and Receiver (Radio) Chips, Power Control Chips, and Products Containing Same, including Cellular Telephone Handsets (Inv. No. 543) – Represented LG Electronics Mobilecomm USA as an intervenor in the Investigation brought by Broadcom Corp. against Qualcomm accusing Qualcomm’s baseband processor chips, which are components used in LG’s cellular telephone handsets.