Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Articles

Personal jurisdiction in ANDA cases after Daimler – Has the analysis changed?

June 23, 2014

Articles

Personal jurisdiction in ANDA cases after Daimler – Has the analysis changed?

June 23, 2014

Back to News Listing

In the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman, 134 S. Ct. 746 (2014), generic pharmaceutical defendants may argue that they are only subject to personal jurisdiction in their own backyards – i.e., where they are incorporated or have their principal places of business. But, Daimler is not so broad, and does not change the decade of cases that have found generic defendants subject to general personal jurisdiction in various forums around the country based on sales in those places.  Indeed, Daimler itself explained that it was not enacting a sweeping change in the law, instead explaining that “the canonical opinion in this area remains International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310.”  Daimler 134 S. Ct. at 754. — Read more on the Fish Litigation Blog

Related Attorneys
Related Services
Related Offices

Stay current with Fish Sign up for our Newsletter