Search Team

Search by Last Name


Mark is a Principal and trial lawyer in the Boston office of Fish & Richardson, where he specializes in trademark, copyright and media litigation.  He has spent his career helping safeguard some of the most recognizable brands in the world as well as assisting start-up and established technology companies develop comprehensive strategies to avoid litigation where possible, and to succeed in litigation when necessary.

Mark stands out from most attorneys because of his ability to understand and internalize new and complex concepts and technology, and present them to a judge or a jury in a way that is persuasive and easy to grasp.  For example, he led the trial and appellate team’s successful presentation of the key technology on behalf of defendant Aereo in ABC v. Aereo, a widely publicized copyright case recently argued before the United States Supreme Court.  The presentation of that technology was the basis of the trial court’s denial of a preliminary injunction, and the Second Circuit’s affirmance of that decision.

Mark also is highly skilled and experienced in conducting accelerated cases.  He was lead trial counsel for the plaintiff in Explorica v. Elderhostel, a trademark case he tried to a successful jury verdict just 10 weeks after filing the complaint.  During that short span, the parties engaged in complete discovery, including taking and defending numerous fact and expert depositions.  He has successfully represented numerous high-profile clients in significant copyright and trademark matters, including representing Houghton Mifflin Harcourt and The Learning Company in litigation against Zynga, where he obtained preliminary and permanent court orders preventing Zynga from using the famous OREGON TRAIL mark in connection with the planned launch of computer games.  Other high-profile matters include representing The New York Times and the Boston Globe (copyright and trademark litigation); Monotype Imaging and Bitstream (copyright and trademark litigation), and New Balance and Warrior Sports (trademark and trade dress litigation).

His exceptional record of success has earned him praise as a problem solver from client and peer surveys.  WTR 1000 has called him “intelligent, thoughtful and client-oriented,” and noted that he has a singular ability to “parse through substantial volumes of information to quickly identify the crux of the matter.”  Legal 500 has described him as a “smart, creative” trial lawyer who “anticipates everything.”


JD, Northeastern University School of Law 1999

BA, Wesleyan University 1994


  • Massachusetts
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
  • United States District Court for the Northern District of New York
  • United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan

Memberships & Affiliations

Member of the International Trademark Association; Media Law Resource Center; Massachusetts Bar Association; Boston Bar Association; and American Bar Association.

Other Distinctions

The World Trademark Review WTR 1000, a peer and client surveyed listing, has identified Mark as a leading practitioner for trademark enforcement and litigation five years in a row (2011-2015). In 2011, WTR 1000 characterized hislitigation work as “incredibly impressive” and further praised Mark as “highly recommended” for court room work. The 2013 edition noted that clients turn to him because he is “intelligent, thoughtful and client-oriented” and one who can “expertly parse through substantial volumes of information to quickly identify the crux of the matter”. Most recently in the 2015 edition, Mark and litigator David Hosp were identified as “leaders in the Boston contentious scene” and a “force to be reckoned with.” In 2011, The Legal 500, another peer and client surveyed listing, identified Mark as a “notable practitioner” who is “smart, creative, and anticipate[s] everything.” In 2012, The Legal 500 reported that he “has a quick grasp on trademark law and procedure” and “can be the ‘brains’ behind a team effort.”  Mark was again recommended in 2015 by The Legal 500 for his Trademark and Copyright work.

Mark was also recognized as an “IP Star” by Managing Intellectual Property magazine (2014, 2015), and a Massachusetts and New England Super Lawyer “Rising Star” by Law & Politics and Boston Magazine (2006-2008; 2011).

Publications and Presentations 

Contributor, World Trademark Review Roundtable, “Best Practice in Trademark Litigation,” Issue 55 (June/July 2015).

Trademark & Copyright Year in Review,” Fish webinar (January 7, 2015).

“Investigation and Enforcement Strategies to Counter Evolving Threats to Your Brand and Product,” Consero Brand Protection & Anti-Counterfeiting Executive Roundtable (July 25, 2014).

IP by Design: Protecting Unique Products Using Trade Dress, Patent, and Copyright Law,” Fish webinar (June 4, 2014).

SXSW Interactive 2014 – Intellectual Property IQ: A Workshop For Artists, Developers, And Entrepreneurs, March 11, 2014.


view all

What's trending with Mark

Filter by
September 26, 2015 PST
Trademark Law and its Challenges 2015
Fish at the Podium
Fish Forum
June 26, 2015
Best Practice in Trademark Litigation
December 3, 2014
Will Trademark Infringement Suits Become More Common at the ITC?
Author: Mark S. Puzella
August 1, 2014
Information v. Intelligence—Providing Actionable Instructions to Trademark Investigators
Authors: Lisa Greenwald-Swire, Mark S. Puzella
August 1, 2014
Information v. Intelligence – Providing Actionable Instructions to Trademark Investigators
July 22, 2014
Fish & Richardson Receives Top Tier 1 National Rankings in Patent Prosecution and Patent Litigation from The Legal 500; Wins 2014 IP Boutique Law Firm Award
Press Releases
July 8, 2014
Fish Announces 39 Attorneys Named “IP Stars” by Managing Intellectual Property Magazine
Press Releases
June 16, 2014
Attys React To High Court's Pom v. Coke Lanham Act Ruling
Media Coverage
June 12, 2014
Supreme Court–Lanham Act Claims Not Preempted by FDCA Labeling Requirements
Author: Mark S. Puzella
March 27, 2014
Supreme Court Issues Decision in Lanham Act False Advertising Case
Author: Mark S. Puzella
load more topics