Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Federal Circuit

Second Reference Can Be Used to Show Inherent Disclosure If Missing Characteristic Is “Necessarily Present” In First Reference

February 5, 2015

Federal Circuit

Second Reference Can Be Used to Show Inherent Disclosure If Missing Characteristic Is “Necessarily Present” In First Reference

February 5, 2015

Back to Fish's Litigation Blog

 

In re Imes, ___F.3d___(Fed. Cir. Jan. 29, 2015) (Lourie, MOORE, Chen) (No. 2014-1206, PTAB) (1 of 5 stars)

Federal Circuit reverses the Board’s rejection of claims relating to a device for communicating digital camera image and video information over a network, and remands for further proceedings.

Federal Circuit disagreed with the Board’s conclusion that the Schuetzle prior art reference, which disclosed a “removable memory card” with metal contacts that communicated with the computer system, disclosed a “wireless communication module.”  The Board’s construction of a “wireless” system was inconsistent with the broadest reasonable interpretation in view of the application, because a removable memory card was not “wireless.”  In addition, Federal Circuit declined to consider an argument that the Patent Office raised first time on appeal, and added a footnote indicating that the case did not implicate the deference to fact finding required by the Supreme Court’s Teva opinion.

Federal Circuit further determined that certain claims were not invalid under § 102 and § 103 based on the Knowles prior art reference, because Knowles’s serial transmission of still images does not satisfy the broadest reasonable construction of the claim phrase “streaming video.”  Federal Circuit also concluded that the combination of Knowles and a second reference did not inherently disclose continuous image transmission since there was no evidence that continuous image transmission was necessarily present in the first reference.

Related Tags

CAFC Summary
Claim Construction
Federal Circuit
inherent feature

Blog Authors

Headshot
Leah A. Edelman | Associate

Leah Edelman is an Associate in the Washington D.C. office of Fish & Richardson. She was previously a Judicial Law Clerk for the Honorable Robert P. Patterson, Jr., of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York and a Judicial Intern for the Honorable...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *