Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

INSIGHTS Webinar: Recent Developments Impacting Hatch-Waxman Litigation

Wednesday, March 18th, 2015, 1:00 pm EDT

INSIGHTS Webinar: Recent Developments Impacting Hatch-Waxman Litigation

This webinar took place on: Wednesday, March 18th, 2015, 1:00 pm EDT

This webinar has ended.
Back to Webinars Listing

The past year saw significant decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and various district courts that impact Hatch-Waxman practice. As one example, the Supreme Court’s decision in Daimler AG v. Bauman has complicated the issue of personal jurisdiction in Hatch-Waxman lawsuits. Moreover, in Commil v. Cisco, the Supreme Court is considering whether a good faith belief in patent invalidity negates inducement under section 271(b).

Join Jon Singer and Brian Coggio, principals at Fish & Richardson, as they discuss noteworthy decisions from 2014. You can also expect this webinar to address:

  • Personal jurisdiction in Hatch-Waxman litigation
  • Good faith belief in invalidity to negate inducement
  • Obviousness in view of Bristol’s Baraclude decision
  • Drug labels as inducing infringement
  • Sham litigation and the recent Tyco decision
  • IPRs and their potential impact on Hatch-Waxman litigation

Click here to watch the replay. 

If you are affiliated with the life sciences or pharmaceutical industries, or have an interest in Intellectual Property (IP) rights or IP litigation, this complimentary webinar is for you.

Fish & Richardson will apply for 1.0 hour of general CLE credit in most states. If you would like to receive CLE credit, register with your state bar information.

Learn more about Fish’s experience with Hatch-Waxman at fr.com.

Related Services

Stay current with Fish Sign up for our Newsletter