Search Team

Search by Last Name
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z

Fish Cases

Litigation Experience

Fish Cases

Litigation Experience

Back to Case Listing

In-Depth

Philips et al v. ZOLL Medical Corporation (D. Mass.). Represent medical device maker ZOLL Medical Corporation as both patentee and accused infringer in cases involving patents relating generally to defibrillator technology. Case pending.

Denimafia, Inc. v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. (S.D.N.Y.). Represent New Balance in trademark infringement dispute.  Case pending.

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA et al. v. Sandoz, Inc. et al. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. (S.D.N.Y.). Represented Teva in Hatch-Waxman dispute regarding a complex mixture of polypeptides.  Was part of trial team that obtained a successful outcome finding all claims infringed, valid, and enforceable.

Teva Pharmaceuticals USA et al. v. Sandoz, Inc. et al. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al. (S.D.N.Y.). Represented Teva in patent litigation involving techniques to measure the molecular weight of complex mixtures of polypeptides

Momenta Pharmaceuticals v. Teva Pharmaceuticals (D. Mass). Represented Teva in patent litigation related to methods of evaluating low molecular weight heparins.

iHance, Inc. v. Eloqua Ltd. (E.D. Va.). Represented Eloqua in patent litigation involving technology for monitoring email and website behavior of email recipients.

Abbott Point of Care, Inc. v. Epocal, Inc. (N.D. Ala.). Represented Epocal in patent litigation dispute related to point-of-care blood testing diagnostic devices. Was part of trial team that obtained jury verdict in Epocal’s favor in finding no infringement.

X-ray Optical Systems v. Innov-X (N.D.N.Y.). Represented Innov-X in patent ownership dispute relating to x-ray optics technology.

Asentinel LLC v. The Info Group, Inc. et al. (W.D. Tenn.). Represented Veramark in patent litigation involving technology used in analyzing telecommunications invoices.