- A method for providing a user with the ability to access and collect personal health records associated with the user in a secure and private manner, the method comprising:
associating access information with the user for the user to use to access a server storing files comprising personal health records associated with the user in a computer readable storage medium;
providing the user with a user interface on a computing device to remotely access the personal health records stored on the server;
receiving at the server the files comprising the personal health records associated with the user from a health care provider associated with the user;.
receiving at the server a request from the user made through the user interface of the computing device for access to the files, wherein the access information is associated with the request;
sending the user a file containing the personal health records associated with user from the server to the computing device in response to the request;
wherein the files are maintained on the server independently from any files maintained by the health care provider and wherein the files are managed privately by the user independently from the health care provider.
Covered Business Method patent review institution decision.
Abstract Idea: Yes
“At this stage of the proceeding, we agree with Petitioner that the claimed invention is directed to an abstract idea: privately managing files by the user. … Management or control by the user or patient rather than by the health care provider is a method of organizing a human activity. On this record, the concept is an abstract idea, just like the basic hedging concept at issue in Bilski and the abstract idea of intermediated settlement in Alice.”
Something More: No
“[W]e consider the challenged claims as an ordered combination. Id. at 2359. On this record, when viewed as a whole, the challenged claims 8–12 simply recite the concept of user management performed by a generic computer. The challenged claims, for example, do not purport to improve the functioning of the computer itself. Nor do they improve another technology or technical field.”
“Restricting access by password also is routine and conventional, on this record. See Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, 772 F.3d 709, 712, 717 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (determining that representative claim 1 is patent ineligible although it recites “a fourth step of restricting general public access.”). Similarly, providing a user interface is an insignificant activity. See Accenture Global Servs., GmbH v. Guidewire Software, Inc., 728 F.3d 1336, 1342–43 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (determining that claim 1 is patent ineligible although it recites a “claim folder,” which “manages claim information . . . by providing a structured and easy to use interface.”)”