1878 |
Frederick Perry Fish opens law firm of Wadleigh & Fish in Boston. |
| |
1883 - 1893 |
The firm wins over 600 patent cases involving Alexander Graham Bell's telephone patents. |
| |
1887 |
U.S. Supreme Court decides Telephone Cases in favor of American Bell Telephone and Alexander Graham Bell's patent. The opinion is the only Supreme Court opinion that fills an entire volume of U.S. Reports. |
| |
1889 |
William K. Richardson joins the firm. |
| |
1893 |
Charles Neave joins the firm. |
| |
1895 |
Firm's clients include The American Bell Telephone Company and General Electric Company, both in New
York City. Fish sends Neave to New York to open a branch office. |
| |
1901 |
Fish offered but declines the presidency of MIT. |
| |
1901-1907 |
Frederick Fish serves as third President of AT&T. During that time, Fish sells stock and bonds
and uses the proceeds to construct new telephone facilities around the country. |
| |
1920 |
Fish's reputation achieves such high proportions that clients literally form lines in the reception room
to see him. |
| |
1930 |
Frederick Fish dies; over the course of his career he had argued or was directly involved in more
patent cases in the U.S. Supreme Court than any other lawyer. It was said that he represented one
side or the other in almost all of the great patent cases between 1890 and 1930. Click here
to read the Memorial to Frederick P. Fish, presented at the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts, December 26, 1931 |
| |
1951 |
William Richardson dies. |
| |
1969 |
Boston and New York offices separate into Fish & Richardson in Boston, Fish & Neave in New York. |
| |
1987 |
F&R has 25 attorneys, 6 legal assistants. |
| |
1988 |
F&R represents Harvard University in obtaining patent on the Harvard Mouse. |
| |
1989 |
Washington, D.C. office opens. |
| |
1993 |
Silicon Valley office opens. |
| |
1994 |
Twin Cities office opens. |
| |
1995 |
San Diego and New York offices open. |
| |
1997 |
The National Law Journal chooses Fish & Richardson's victory for Adobe in Quantel v.
Adobe Systems, Inc. as one of the most significant defense verdicts in 1997. The Adobe victory
was one of only 15 verdicts named as most notable by The National Law Journal , and the only patent
litigation victory to make the list. |
| |
1998 |
The National Law Journal chooses Fish & Richardson's $36 million victory for ITI in ITI v. Ademco
Distribution, Inc. as one of the biggest verdicts of 1998. The National Law Journal also chooses the
defense verdict and $15 million award on counter claim in US, ex rel Battaglia v. Texas Data Control
as one of the most significant defense verdicts of 1998. (Dallas Office) |
| |
1999 |
Delaware office opens. The National Law Journal chooses Fish & Richardson's $32.3 million
victory for Power Integrations in Power Integrations v. Motorola, Inc. as one of the biggest
verdicts of 1999. |
| |
2000 |
Dallas office opens. The National Law Journal chooses Fish & Richardson's victory in Bell
Communications Research, Inc. (Bellcore) v. Marconi Communications (formerly FORE Systems, Inc.)
as one of the most significant defense victories of 2000. The case, which was won on summary
judgment, was one of only two summary judgment victories to be selected for the year's best defense verdicts.
|
| |
2001 |
In a May 2001 survey, IP Worldwide finds that Fish & Richardson handles more
patent litigation than any other firm.
|
| |
2002 |
In a May 2002 survey, IP Worldwide finds that Fish & Richardson handles more
patent litigation than any other firm, with 30% more cases than the second place firm.
|
| |
2003 |
In a May 2003 survey, IP Law & Business finds that Fish & Richardson defends more patent litigation than any other firm.
|
| |
2004 |
In a May 2004 survey, IP Law & Business finds that Fish & Richardson is #1 in patent litigation. The firm filed or defended 69 new patent cases in 2003, more than 20% more cases than the next closest competitor.
|
| |
2005 |
In a July 2005 survey, IP Law & Business finds that Fish & Richardson is #1 in patent litigation. Austin office opens. The National Law Journal chooses Fish & Richardson's victory in Arendi v. Microsoft Corp. as one of the most significant defense victories of 2004.
|
| |
2006 |
In a July 2006 survey, IP Law & Business finds that Fish & Richardson is #1 in patent litigation. Atlanta office opens.
|