Search Tips:
1. Search Adjacent Words - Place quotes around the exact keyword phrase you want to search. Ex: "regulatory environments"
2. Search in Title Only - Type title: and surround the search terms in quotations to specifically search in titles. Ex: title:"regulatory environments" close
|
Fish at the Podium,
Fish Forum
05/05/2011
Trademark Functionality: Job's Daughters Has Risen Again!
To listen to the audio for the Trademark Functionality webinar, please click here. For a copy of the webinar outline with case citations, please click here. For a copy of the webinar slides, please click here. We also encourage you to download our Spring 2011 Trademark Thoughts newsletter on this hot topic.
 |
Fish & Richardson invites you to participate in a complimentary webinar that looks at the recent Ninth Circuit decision in Fleischer Studios Inc. v. A.V.E.L.A. Inc. (aka the Betty Boop case). Trademark Functionality: Job's Daughters Has Risen Again!
Thursday, May 5, 2011 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm ET On the web
The Ninth Circuit's recent decision in the Betty Boop case resurrected the doctrine of defensive aesthetic functionality first articulated in the 1980 in International Order of Job’s Daughters v. Lindeburg & Co., 633 F.2d 912. The court ruled that use of another's trademark on a product to express loyalty or affection for the owner of the trademark is a "functional" use and not infringement. This case should be of concern to trademark owners, as it could impact the landscape of trademark management and licensing and open the door to more trademark counterfeiting.
This program will explore:
- The historic underpinnings of aesthetic functionality;
- The outbreak of defensive aesthetic functionality more than thirty years ago; and
- The best legal arguments against it today.
Moderator: Irene Hudson, Principal, New York
Speaker: Anthony Fletcher, Senior Principal, New York
Tony Fletcher began his trademark career in 1966, and has practiced trademark law and related fields virtually exclusively since 1971. He is the 2011 recipient of the INTA Ladas Memorial Award for his recent article “The Product with the Parody Trademark: What’s Wrong with Chewy Vuiton?” and was the recipient of INTA's President's Award for Lifetime Achievement in 2003.
|
© Copyright 2011 Fish & Richardson P.C. These materials may be considered advertising for legal services under the laws and rules of professional conduct of the jurisdictions in which we practice. The material contained in this newsletter has been gathered by the lawyers at Fish & Richardson P.C. for informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice. Transmission is not intended to create and receipt does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Legal advice of any nature should be sought from legal counsel. For more information about Fish & Richardson P.C. and our practices, please visit www.fr.com. |
|
|
|